| Issue 20 March 1999 |
Import quotas may help U.S. gluten, new uses |
Prairie Grains is the official
publication of |
The U.S. gluten industry and new products made
from domestic wheat gluten may get a boost, with a
three-year quota imposed last summer on
European-subsidized sales of wheat gluten into the U.S. Vital wheat gluten is the natural protein portion of wheat that is extracted after wheat is milled into flour. In its finished form, wheat gluten is a fine, tan powder consisting of 75 to 80% protein. Wheat gluten is a popular ingredient in multi-grain and high-fiber breads and other bakery goods. Wheat starch is produced as a co-product of wheat gluten, and is used as is or in modified forms in numerous food formulations and various industrial applications, including paper production. Starches and gluten are also key ingredients in many new markets such as biodegradable plastics and films. Tariffs made it possible in the past for wheat processors in the EU to protect their starch markets and sell wheat starch within the EU for twice the world price. They then used their starch profits to subsidize the sale of the co-productwheat glutenin world markets at prices below the cost of production. This practice not only hurt premiums paid for high protein wheat produced by U.S. farmers, but also handicapped wheat gluten R&D in the United States, as investors have been unwilling to create markets merely to serve European gluten. It has been a threat as well to U.S. gluten processors; if driven out of business by heavily subsidized gluten imported from the EU, a domestic market for 50 million bushels of U.S. wheat would be eliminated. From 1983 through 1995, U.S. imports of wheat gluten from the EU increased at a 47% annual rate, according to Kyle Stiegert, assistant professor of agricultural economics at Kansas State University. In 1996 alone, EU wheat gluten shipments to the U.S. increased nearly 162% above 1993 shipments, according to the Wheat Gluten Industry Council (WGIC). The ratio of EU imports to U.S. production rose from 34% in 1993 to almost 75% in 1997, according to the Kansas Wheat Commission. Stiegert says increased imports were noted in declining U.S. capacity utilization (below 50% in 1997), decreased profitability of U.S. firms, and lower imports from other nations. The WGIC won a small victory last year in its attempt to correct the trade imbalance. The WGIC filed a 201 petition with the International Trade Commission in September 1997, to establish a quota on gluten imported into the U.S. The ITC determined in a 3-0 vote that increased imports of wheat gluten are "a substantial cause of serious injury" to the U.S. wheat gluten industry. Responding to the ITC report, President Clinton on June 1, 1998 approved a three-year quota on wheat gluten imports from the EU and all other nonexcluded countries. The quota went into effect immediately, and includes an annual import gluten cap of 54 million pounds from the EU. The quota will increase 6% annually for the duration of the three-year relief period, with possible extension for up to five additional years. Presuming EU gluten imports are reined in, and imports dont increase from countries excluded from the quota, the ITC estimated that the quota initially will raise domestic wheat gluten prices to between 3.2% and 8.3% over 1997 levels. U.S. producers domestic sales volume would increase by 14% to 19.8%, and sales revenues would increase by 20.8% to 27%. How is the quota working out? According to the Kansas Wheat Commission, U.S. Department of Commerce official records indicate that from June 1 through Nov. 30, 1998, the EU shipped approximately 26% more gluten into the U.S. than is allowed for the full quota year, which ends May 31. "Published data indicates that shipments from the EU have stopped since November; however, violations have stalled the relief that the U.S. wheat gluten industry expected during the first year of the quota," says Ladd Seaberg, President of Midwest Grain, the largest U.S. gluten manufacturer. As a result, Seaberg says U.S. Customs officials are investigating apparent EU violations, and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is considering the imposition of sanctions, which could provide the industry with the kind of relief intended by the quota. "Although the tilt in the playing field was not corrected in the first half of the fiscal year, we are now experiencing indications of strengthened demand for our wheat gluten and continue to realize gradual but steady growth in sales of our specialty wheat proteins, especially in the cosmetics and personal care markets," Seaberg says. KSUs Stiegert is studying the gluten issue in a multi-phase project funded by the Wheat Utilization Committee, comprised of members from U.S. Wheat Associates and the National Association of Wheat Growers Foundation. Stiegert is analyzing the effects of imported gluten, the import quota, and the impact of EU policies on world wheat protein premiums. He says that although the U.S. gluten industry was successful in obtaining a short-term reprieve against imports, whether the gluten quota will provide much long-term economic relief is not apparent. One key reason: Canada, a major producer and exporter of gluten, was excluded from the quota. Canada recently has added considerable new capacity, and a weaker Canadian dollar may encourage exports into the U.S., Stiegert says. Mexico is also exempt from the quota. Although it is not a gluten exporter, its exclusion from the quota makes it a possible conduit for illegal transshipments of gluten into the U.S. Further, Stiegert says the U.S. industry has significant excess capacity to produce gluten. Only 52% of U.S. capacity is being used in the domestic gluten production process; most U.S. industries typically operate between 75% and 95% of capacity. Increasing domestic production capacity will lessen the quotas impact. These factors are likely to limit the quotas effectiveness, but may give the industry time to develop value-added products that use their primary outputs, says Stiegert. "One of the reasons that the WGIC wanted a gluten quota was to give the industry time to develop its value-added processing sector. Without locally adequate supplies of starch and gluten from wheat, such investments and product development would be unlikely," says Stiegert, in the first phase of his gluten study. "With more value-added options available for these raw outputs, the U.S. wheat starch-gluten industry could generate a more profitable environment. Without success in developing value-added products or somehow getting the EU to restructure its policies, consolidation within the industry seems inevitable." Stiegerts study may be found on his web site: www.agecon.ksu.edu/stiegert. Potential Products from Wheat Gluten Hard red
spring wheat is a primary source for gluten, the natural
protein portion of wheat that is extracted after wheat is
milled into flour. In its finished form, wheat gluten is
a fine, tan powder consisting of 75 to 80% protein.
Gluten has many potential uses: (Compiled by USDA-ARS researchers G. L. Lookhart, Manhattan, Kan.; and J.A. Bietz, Peoria, Ill.) |
| Copyright Prairie Grains Magazine March 1999 |
|