| Issue 21 April/May 1999 |
Managing
your farm or ranch back in black: EZ-WayBy
Harlan Hughes
|
Prairie Grains is the official
publication of |
Ive developed an easy way to analyze the
economics of your farm or ranch business. This analysis,
which I call the "EZ-Way," requires only three
numbers: 1) total overhead costs, 2) your variable cost
per dollar of gross income produced, and 3) your total
dollars of gross income generated this last year. These
numbers can be obtained from your IRS income tax forms
and associated farm business records. With these three EZ-Way numbers you can determine your farm or ranch business profits, your break-even volume and average net profit margin. Once you know your net profit margin, you can calculate the gross income change needed to hit a target net farm income. A graph is indeed worth a thousand words and this EZ-Way analysis lends itself to a graphical analysis of your farm and ranch business. You need to design the EZ-Way graph so that the horizontal axis represents dollars of total gross income while the vertical axis represents total dollar costs. Step One: Step Two: Step Three: The break-even gross income in this business is immediately identifiable as the point where the gross income line crosses the total cost line. Now compare your actual gross income to see if it was above or below the break-even level of gross income. The difference between the total income line and the total cost line gives you the net income for this business. If you divide the net income by the gross income and multiply by 100 you can generate the profit margin for this business. This graphical analysis of your business was conducted with only three business numbers: total overhead, direct cost per dollar of gross income and total gross income. Lets now apply this EZ-Way analysis to a study farm. This farms total farm overhead is calculated at $65,909 for the total year. These overhead costs are for land, unpaid family and operator labor, and management. The overhead costs are plotted as a horizontal line corresponding to this $65,909 on the vertical axis. The direct costs per dollar of income generated on this study farm was 64 cents per dollar. The point generated to plot the direct costs was $100,000 on the horizontal axis and $129,909 ($65,909 plus $64,000) on the vertical axis. This line is labeled total cost. The gross income line comes out of the origin (0,0) and goes through point (100,000; 100,000). Now that we have the three lines on this graphoverhead costs, total costs and gross income we can now proceed to analyze this farm via this EZ-Way. The breakeven gross income for this farm is where the gross income line crosses the total cost line. In this case, it is at $184,305 of gross income. The actual gross income for last year was $188,298, so gross income last year was only slightly above the break-even level. In fact, net income for the $188,298 gross income level was only $1,428 dollars or only 0.76 percent of gross income. This says that less than one penny out of every dollar grossed was generated as net income. Clearly, adding more gross income with such a low profit margin is not a viable solution. The only viable solution for this business is to get better before getting bigger. My experience in helping beef farmers and ranchers cut costs through my Integrated Resource Management Program suggests that most producers can cut cost by increasing their management intensity. The more details monitored, the more intense the management. The more intense the management, the lower the costs of production. Lets, then, look at two increased management intensities proposed by the study farms manager after many agonizing hours of analysis and pencil pushing. One financial consultant suggests that the first thing that a farmer or rancher needs to do in a financial emergency is eliminate any non-critical overhead. This may even mean selling some or all underutilized assets. This could be farm machinery, equipment or even land in a financial emergency. This study farm family decided that it could reduce the non-family living $32,000 overhead costs by 15%. This $4,800 reduction would decreased total overhead down to $61,109. Now the break-even gross income, where the new total cost line crosses the total gross income line, is reduced to $171,340. This break-even gross income is down $16,958 from the initial analysis. Note that this $4,800 direct reduction in overhead costs reduced the breakeven gross income by $16,958. On the other hand, if this farm maintained the original $188,298 gross income, this reduction in overhead costs would increase net farm income to $6,064 and the profit margin to 3.2% of gross income. This increased management intensity is at least moving the farms performance numbers in the right direction. After considerably more agonizing analysis, this family arrived at a second conclusion that increased management could reduce their direct cost of production by 6.25%, or four cents per dollar of gross income without impacting gross sales. When this revised EZ-Way analysis was plotted, the projected break-even gross income was again reduced to $153,103. If the same $188,298 dollars of gross income is generated, net farm income projects at $13,596 with a 7.2% profit margin. A 6.25% decrease in direct costs increased net income by another $7,532. It may well be easier to intensify management and increase the efficiency of what is already being produced than to try to produce more. Ive observed that its generally more profitable for a farmer or rancher to get better than to get bigger. Hughes (email: hhughes@ndsuext.nodak. edu) has developed a series of articles designed to help farmers manage todays challenging economic times, under the information umbrella of "Assessing Your Business For Todays Market and Beyond." Back issues may be found on the NDSU Extension Communications website: http://www.ext.nodak.edu/extnews/newsrelease/back-issues/ |
| Copyright Prairie Grains Magazine April/May 1999 |
|