Tables for the "1996 Barley, Wheat and Oat Variety Trials" article.

Table 1. Grain yield of barley barieties in bushels per acre; 1992-96
Location
Variety Crookston
81		 Morris
4		 Stephen
1		 St. Paul
3		 Roseau
1		 Mean
17
Robust
Excel
Stander
Foster
LSD 0.05		 92
106
107
99
4		 90
100
103
90
3		 108
112
112
105
14		 86
96
102
97
2		 99
124
111
107
15		 92
104
106
97
3
1Number trials

 

Table 2. Agronomic traits of barley varieties; 1992-96
Variety Heading
(June)		 Height
(cm)		 Lodging
(%)		 Plump
(%)
  111 16 6 10
Robust
Excel
Stander
Foster		 22
22
23
22		 83
75
73
76		 34
35
26
36		 82
76
89
88
1Number trials

 

Table 3. Quality comparisons from regional nursery (7 trials); 1994 and 1995
Variety Barley
protein
(%)		 Plump
barley
(%)		 Malt
extract
(%)		 Diastatic
power
(Lo)		 Alpha anylase
(20o units)
Morex
Robust
Stander
Foster		 14.3
14.3
13.6
13.3		 60
71
77
79		 76.9
76.5
78.0		 133
125
131
126		 42
32
40
38

 

Table 4. Yields of hard red spring wheat varieties in Minnesota, 1994-96
  South North State Average
Variety 1996 1994-96 1996 1994-96 1996 1994-96
bu/acre
BacUp1
Sharp
Kulm
Norlander
Butte 86
2375
Russ
Oxen
AC Domain2
2370
Grandin
Hamer
Trenton
Lars
Stoa
Norm
Verde
Nordic
Marshall
AC Cora1
Gunner2
LSD, 5%		 48.3
58.7
59.6
66.3
57.1
63.9
64.7
66.0
56.9
65.7
64.8
62.1
62.0
65.2
64.2
66.7
67.9
69.7
67.2
56.9
55.8
9.8		 44.2
55.8
56.1
56.7
54.2
57.8
59.0
61.7
-
57.5
54.7
60.6
54.7
59.1
53.1
57.3
57.4
54.9
54.4
47.6

5.1		 39.0
52.2
50.6
56.1
52.6
55.5
52.0
57.9
47.9
51.1
50.5
58.5
46.5
58.0
49.5
45.5
58.7
54.6
50.8
51.0
48.5
8.0		 34.4
46.0
45.8
48.7
43.4
47.7
44.6
46.4
-
47.5
43.8
47.7
43.1
49.8
45.6
38.2
47.7
45.8
44.0
43.8

4.5		 43.4
55.5
55.1
61.2
54.9
59.7
58.4
61.9
52.4
58.4
57.7
60.3
54.3
61.6
56.8
56.1
63.1
62.2
59.0
54.0
52.2
6.4		 39.7
51.4
51.6
53.1
49.4
53.3
52.6
55.5
-
53.0
49.8
54.9
49.5
54.9
49.7
48.8
53.1
50.9
49.8
46.0

3.6
1 Two-year data. 2 One-year data

 

Table 5. Characteristics of hard red spring wheat varieties1, 1993-95
Variety Heading Height Lodging Leaf
Rust		 Stem
Rust		 foliar
Disease2		 Scab
Severity		 Scab
Tolerance3		 Test
Weight		 Wheat
Protein		 Milling/
Baking
  date inches score4 -------- rating5 -------- -------- rating -------- lbs/bu %6 quality
Bacup
Sharp
Kulm
Norlander
Butte 86
2375
Russ
Oxen
AC Domain8
2370
Grandin
Hamer
Trenton
Lars
Norm
Verde
Nordic
Marshall
AC Cora7
Gunner8		 6-26
6-27
6-27
6-27
6-27
6-28
6-28
6-28
6-28
6-29
6-29
6-29
6-29
6-30
6-30
7-1
7-2
7-2
7-3
7-3		 32
32
33
31
33
31
32
30
33
32
32
30
36
28
31
30
31
30
35
33		 3.0
2.9
2.8
2.3
2.7
3.7
3.2
2.8
2.2
2.3
2.4
1.9
2.9
2.1
2.3
2.1
2.4
1.8
2.6
1.9		 R
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
R
R
MS
R
R
MR
R
MR
MR
MS		 R
R
R
MS
R
R
MR
MR
R
MR
R
R
MR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R		 MS
MS
S
MS
S
S
S
-
S
S
S
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MS
MR
MR		 MR
MR-MS
MS
MS-MR
MR-MS
MR-MS
MS
MR-MS
MS
MS-S
MS-S
MS
MS
S
S
MS
MS
MS
MS-S
MR-MS		 1
2.5
3
4
3
2
3
4
3
3.5
3
3.5
2
5
5
3
3.5
3
3
2.5		 60.0
59.7
58.7
57.3
58.3
58.8
57.7
57.9
57.3
57.8
58.6
57.7
58.4
56.5
56.2
57.4
56.9
57.5
57.2
58.7		 17.3
15.4
15.8
14.9
15.5
15.3
15.1
15.2
15.9
15.1
15.4
15.1
15.8
14.2
14.1
14.3
13.7
14.1
16.2
16.1		 high
medium-high
high-medium
medium
medium-high
medium
medium
medium
medium-high
medium
high
medium-low
high-medium
medium-high
medium
low
medium-low
high-medium
high-medium
1 Only new varieties and older varieties with scab ratings better than susceptible are included in trials. 2 Rated based on NDSU data from 1994-1996. 3 Tolerance to maintain plump kernels under scab epidemics; 1 = very well, 2 = well, 3 = moderate, 4 = fair, 5 = poor. 4 1 = erect, 9 = flat. 5 R = resistant, MR = moderately resistant, MS = moderately susceptible, S = susceptible. 6 Correlated to 12% moisture. 7 Two year data adjusted to 1994-1996. 8 Single year data

 

Table 8. Oat yield (bu/A) at each experiment station and across all experiment stations in Minnesota, 1994-1996.
  Rosemount Waseca Lamberton Morris Crookston G. Rapids Average
Dane
INO9201
Jim
Jerry
Troy
Pal
Classic
Milton
Gem
Paul (hulless)
Belle
Whitestone
LSD 5%		 81.9
78.7
79.5
95.4
83.2
59.4
93.8
86.6
87.8
49.3
85.2
82.8
9.6		 59.7
76.2
61.9
81.9
70.3
61.4
83.7
78.0
78.6
46.6
75.7
72.2
7.3		 57.3
56.4
44.4
69.6
58.7
59.4
69.6
64.1
75.2
54.2
61.0
62.8
8.7		 88.5
87.3
79.7
88.2
78.8
58.3
72.9
92.0
103.9
75.2
96.4
68.4
8.6		 89.5
103.7
112.1
93.8
123.7
86.6
89.0
124.4
111.8
81.5
101.3
93.3
9.7		 98.5
88.2
88.8
101.1
84.9
68.6
86.9
108.0
95.8
74.4
82.7
103.9
11.1		 79.2
81.8
77.8
88.4
83.3
64.8
82.7
92.2
92.2
63.5
83.7
80.6
3.9

 

Table 9. Agronomic characteristics of oat varieties in Minnesota, 1994-1996
  Heading
DAP1		 Height
Inches		 Lodging
1-52		 Test Wt.
lbs/bu		 Groat
%		 Crown
Rust3		 BYD
1-94		 Smut
%
Dane
INO9201
Jim
Jerry
Troy
Classic
Pal
Milton
Gem
Paul (hulless)
Belle
Whitestone		 52
54
55
60
60
60
61
61
61
62
63
65		 31
31
32
37
39
34
27
34
36
40
38
35		 2.1
2.1
2.1
2.3
3.4
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.3
1.9
1.8
2.7		 34
36
37
39
33
36
33
35
38
-
38
38		 72.6
70.7
73.3
71.7
68.4
68.5
67.8
70.9
73.3
-
74.8
72.0		 IR
IS
IS
R
IS
IR
IR
IS
R
R
R
R		 8
4
4
4
3
2
6
7
4
6
7
5		 1
30
0
40
0
10
1
5
5
0
5
5
1DAP=Days after Planting; 2Lodging 1=erect 5=flat; 3Crown Rust R=resistant, I=intemediate, S=susceptible; 4BYD 1=No Syptoms 9=Dead

 

Table 10. Oat yields (bu/A) at off-station locations in Minnesota, 1996.
  Roseau Stephens Winona Wells Madison
Dane
INO9201
Jim
Jerry
Troy
Pal
Classic
Milton
Gem
Paul (hulless)
Belle
Whitestone
LSD 5%
Average		 99.8
93.9
98.4
06.2
97.1
81.4
88.5
112.7
110.3
81.6
116.3
112.9
11.0
99.9		 48.2
57.9
56.2
67.1
72.2
55.9
60.9
68.4
73.4
55.9
66.4
76.0
14.2
63.2		 25.0
38.0
31.0
48.0
18.0
38.0
26.0
39.0
31.0
58.0
44.0
50.0
16.0
37.2		 60.0
43.0
40.0
30.0
38.0
46.0
42.0
45.0
87.0
60.0
77.0
69.0
21.5
53.1		 74.0
97.0
89.0
95.0
59.0
64.0
96.0
74.0
108.0
66.0
121.0
117.0
17.5
88.3