| The
phase-out of farm payments under the new Farm Bill means
more attention will now be paid to other risk management
tools. That fact is already evident, as a big issue for
wheat growers of late has been a new crop insurance
program called Crop Revenue Coverage. Following is a
brief look at CRC, and several other significant crop
insurance issues: Crop
Revenue Coverage
Crop Revenue Coverage, or
CRC, is a new crop insurance plan developed by the
private sector, which protects against lost revenue
caused by low prices, low yields, or any combinations of
the two.
CRC is similar to
multi-peril crop insurance (MPCI) in that it is based on
your actual production history, or APH. However, CRC has
been proven to return lower loss ratios than MPCI.
Further, despite a premium cost that is higher than MPCI,
the product has proven popular with farmers (it has been
already tested in Iowa and Nebraska in a corn/soybean
pilot program) because they see it as an insurance
product that has better risk management coverage, and a
better revenue guarantee.
Some counties in
Minnesota and North Dakota have been involved in a
similar pilot program called Income Protection (IP).
There are key differences among CRC and IP coverage,
however: IP is based on single-unit coverage, versus
optional multi-unit or sectional coverage offered through
CRC. Plus, although both IP and CRC establish a minimum
revenue floor, CRC provides upward price protection,
based upon market-determined prices.
The National Association
of Wheat Growers and affiliated state wheat associations
launched a major campaign this past summer, to get as
many wheat producing states as possible to qualify for
the new CRC pilot program.
Seven statesTexas,
Kansas, Nebraska, Michigan, Washington, South Dakota, and
parts of Montanawere selected by the Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation (FCIC) board last July for
inclusion in CRC for wheat in the 1997 crop year. The
NAWG would have preferred that the program be offered in
all wheat-producing states in 1997, but wheat growers
understood the FCICs need to test the concept
before making it available nationwide, said NAWG
President Chuck Merja.
For states included in
the CRC pilot program, the 1997 minimum price guarantee
is $3.97 per bushel.
The MAWG and the NDGGA
have been lobbying intensely to get Minnesota and North
Dakota included in the CRC pilot program in 1997. The
outlook is promising that at least parts of the two
states will be included in the CRC pilot next year. An
announcement is expected by the FCIC board by December.
South Dakota growers
interested in learning more about CRC should consult a
private agent. As well, more CRC details will be included
in Prairie Grains once the status of the program next
year is known.
Nonstandard
Classification Change
The MAWG teamed up with
private crop insurance agents in Minnesota to bring
relief to farmers who fell into a high risk category of
federal crop insurance coverage, called "nonstandard
classification," because of heavy crop losses in the
1990s.
Nonstandard
classification is used by the FCIC to designate farmers
as high-risk policy holders. The nonstandard
classification system (NCS) allows farmers to qualify for
federal crop insurance, but at a much higher premium
rate. A farmer may fall into the category for one crop,
but have other crops qualify for normal coverage rates.
In the past, it was
usually mismanagement which landed some farmers in the
NCS. However, crop losses due to multiple years of
adverse weather in the 1990s (with Northern Plains wheat
plagued by scab, and the orange wheat blossom midge) is
now being factored into the crop insurance production
history for some farmers.
"Good
farmerswho are sound managersare being
classified as high risk, simply because of multiple
weather-related crop disasters out of their
control," says Jerry Nordick, MAWG president. For
example, one farmer in Pennington County, Minn., was
notified that his crop insurance premium for wheat would
rise from $7.12 per acre in 1996 to $19.26 per acre in
1997an increase of over $10 an acrebecause of
his new NCS status.
The MAWG and members of
the Minnesota Independent Insurance Agents (MIIA) brought
the matter to the attention of officials in Washington,
D.C., including senior FCIC officials and U.S.
Representatives David Minge (D-MN) and Peterson (D-MN).
Several recommendations were made so that the nonstandard
classification takes disaster years and weather-related
crop losses into account.
Rep. Peterson was
successful in fixing the problem in 11 northwest
Minnesota counties, removing more than half of the new
producers from the NCS listing, as well as some producers
who have been previously listed in the NCS, because of
adverse weather.
Technical corrections are
still needed to prevent nonstandard classification
problems for growers down the road, says Nordick.
1997 MPCI Price
Election
The Risk Management
Agency (RMA) of USDA has determined that the 1997 wheat
price election for multi-peril crop insurance will be
$3.85 per bushel for wheat and durum wheat. This level
represents a 30-cent per bushel increase over the 1996
price election, which is available to producers who elect
additional coverage for their 1997 crop.
Producers who elect the
catastrophic (CAT) level of coverage will be insured at
60 percent of the established price level, or $2.31 per
bushel for wheat and durum.
The RMA reviewed market
and price conditions throughout August in making the
final price election determination. For comparison, 1997
September wheat futures in the three major markets traded
in the $3.90 to $4.15 range.
Note that USDA Farm
Service Agency (FSA) offices will no longer sell basic
CAT coverage, which began with crops having a Sept. 30,
1996 closing date. Growers who had been purchasing CAT
policies from their local FSA offices will be notified of
this change, if they havent been already, and have
the opportunity to select a private agent to continue
servicing their insurance needs.
|