Issue 32
November/
December 2000

Library

Home

E-Mail

Back

Prairie Grains is the official publication of the Minnesota Association of Wheat Growers, North Dakota Grain Growers Association, South Dakota Wheat, Inc. and the Minnesota Barley Growers Assocation.

Copyright Prairie
Grains Magazine
November/
December 2000

2000 Small Grain Variety Trial Results in North Dakota

Variety Selection Can Impact Markets

Small grain varieties are tested each year at North Dakota State University Research and Extension Centers. The relative performance of these varieties can be determined from the following tables.

Wheat agronomic and quality ratings are presented in Tables 1 and 2, while yield, protein and test weight data are presented in Tables 3 - 4. Durum agronomic and quality ratings are presented in Tables 5 and 6, with yield, protein and test weight presented in Tables 7-8.  Barley agronomic ratings are presented in Table 9 and yield, protein, test weight and plump data are presented in Table 10.

Successful wheat, durum and barley production depends on multiple factors including selecting the right variety for a particular area. The information included in this publication is meant to aid in selecting that variety or group of varieties. The data is only meant to make relative comparisons of performance among varieties.

Characteristics to evaluate in selecting a variety are: yield potential in your area; protein content when grown with proper fertility; straw strength and plant height; reaction to important diseases; and maturity.

When selecting a top yielding variety, it is best to use data that summarizes several years and locations. The notion that the single data set nearest your farm will indicate which variety will perform the best for you is incorrect. Choose the variety that on average performs the best at multiple locations near you over several years.

Variety selection not only impacts production, but in the long term can impact markets.  The collective variety choices of producers have as great an impact on quality conscience markets, particularly international ones, as any other single factor. Selecting varieties with good processing quality is essential to maintain market recognition.

The information included in the following tables was provided by the following NDSU and USDA researchers: Bliane Schatz, Bob Henson, Pat Carr, Eric Eriksmoen, Mark Halvorson, Bryan Hanson, Neil Riveland, Jim Miller, Robert Stack, Marcia McMullen, Richard Frohberg, Len Francl, Truman Olson, Jack Rasmussen, Rich Horsley, Jerry Franckowiak, Elias Elias, and Frank Manthy.

TABLE 1: 2001 North Dakota hard red spring wheat variety description table, agronomic traits.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REACTION TO DISEASE1

QUALITY FACTORS

Variety

Agent or Origin1

Year Released

Beard

Height

Straw Strenght

Maturity

Stem Rust

Leaf Rust

Foliar
Disease

Root Rot

Head Scab

Test Weight

Wheat Protein

Quality Rating

Coteau

ND

1978

yes

med.

m. strg

med

R

NA

M

MS

MS

Avg.

High

Good

Stoa

ND

1984

yes

med.

m. strg.

m. early

R

MR

MS

M

MS

High

Ave.

Ave.

Butte 66

ND

1986

yes

med.

m.strg.

early

R

MS

MS

MS

MS

High

Ave.

Avg.

Amidon

ND

1988

yes

med.

med.

med.

R

R

M

MR

S

High

Avg.

Avg.

Grandin

ND

1989

yes

s.dwf.

strg.

early

R

S

S

M

S

High

Avg.

Good

2370

NDSURF

1990

yes

s.dwf.

v. strg.

m. early

R

NA

S

S

MS*

High

Avg.

Poor-Avg

2375

NDSURF

1990

yes

s.dwf.

med.

m.early

R

S

S

M

MS*

High

Avg.

Poor-Avg.

Sharp

SD

1990

yes

med.

med.

early

R

MS

MS

S

MS*

High

Avg.

Poor

AC Barrie

Can

1994

no

med.

med.

med.

R

S

M

M

M

High

Avg.

Good

Kulm

ND

1994

yes

med.

strg.

early

R

MR

MS

MS

S

High

High

Avg-Good

2398

NDSURF

1995

yes

s.dwf.

strg.

m.lateS

R

S

MR

MS

VS

Avg.

Low

Poor

Ernest

ND

1995

yes

med.

med.

med.

R

MS

S

NA

S

High

High

Poor-Avg.

Glupro

ND

1995

yes

tall

med.

m.late

R

MS

S

NA

VS

Avg.

V.High

Good

Gunner

AgriPro

1995

yes

med.

m.strg.

med.

R

MS

MR

S

M

High

High

Ave-Good

Hamer

AgriPro

1995

yes

s.dwf.

v.strg.

med.

R

MR

M

NA

S

Avg.

Avg.

Poor

Lars

AgriPro

1995

yes

s.dwf.

v.strg.

med.

R

R

MR

NA

S

Avg.

Low

Poor

McNeal

MT

1995

yes

med.

strg.

m.early

MS

S

M

M

VS

Avg.

Avg.

Poor-Avg.

Russ

SD

1995

yes

med.

med.

m.early

R

R

S

S

S*

Avg.

Avg.

Avg.

Trenton

ND

1995

yes

med.

med.

med.

R

MR

MS

S

S*

High

Avg.

Avg.

Verde

MN

1995

yes

s.dwf.

strg.

med.

R

MR

MR

M

MS*

Avg.

Low

Poor

AC Majestic

Cargill Can

1996

no

med.

med.

med.

R

MS

MR

NA

S*

N/A

N/A

N/A

Keene

ND

1996

yes

med.

med.

med.

R

R

S

S

S

High

Avg.

Avg.

Oxen

SD

1996

yes

s.dwf.

strg.

m.early

R

R

S

S

S

Avg.

Avg.

Avg-Good

Sharp-
shooter

WPB

1996

yes

med.

med.

early

R

MR

MS

M

MS

High

Avg.

Poor+

Forge

SD

1997

yes

s.dwf.

m.strg.

early

R

S

MR

MS

MS

High

Low

Poor-Avg+

Nora

AgriPro

1997

yes

s.dwf.

strg.

med.

R

MS

MS

S

S

Avg.

High

Good

Argent3

ND

1998

yes

s.dwf.

strg.

early

R

S

S

S

S

High

Avg.

Good

Hagar

AgriPro

1998

yes

s.dwf.

strg.

med.

R

MS

M

NA

S

Avg.

Low

Poor-Avg+

HJ98

MN

1998

yes

s.dwf.

strg.

m.early

R

MS

MS

MS

MS

Avg.

Low

Poor+

Ingot

SD

1998

yes

s.dwf.

med.

early

R

S

S

M

MS*

High

Avg.

Poor-Avg+

Dandy

N.Star G.

1998

yes

s.dwf

v.strg.

early

R

S

MS

S

S

N/A

N/A

N/A

Mckenzie

Terra Int.

1998

yes

med.

med.

m.early

R

R

S

MS

S

N/A

N/A

N/A

Parshall

ND

1999

yes

med.

strg.

m.early

R4

MS

M

M

M

High

Avg.

Good

Reeder

ND

1999

yes

s.dwf.

strg.

m.early

R

MR

M

M

S

High

Avg.

Avg.

McVey

MN

1999

yes

med.

med.

med

R

S

S

NA

M

Low

Low

Poor+

Ivan

AgriPro

1999

yes

s.dwf.

v.strg.

med.

R

MR

S

MS

MS

High

Low

Poor+

Ember

SDSU

1999

yes

s.dwf

med.

m.early

R

S

S

NA

MS

N/A

N/A

N/A

Aurora

N.Star G.

1999

yes

s.dwf

strg

m.early

R

R

S

NA

S

N/A

N/A

N/A

Mercury

N.Star.G

1999

yes

s.dwf

strg

m.early

R

MR

S

MS

S

N/A

N/A

N/A

Norpro

AgriPro

1999

yes

s.dwf

Strg

med

R

R

S

MS

MS