Issue 40
November 2001

Library

Home

E-Mail

Back

Prairie Grains is the official publication of the Minnesota Association of Wheat Growers, North Dakota Grain Growers Association and South Dakota Wheat, Inc.

Copyright Prairie Grains Magazine November 2001

2001 North Dakota Small Grain Variety Trials Results

Small grain varieties are tested each year at North Dakota State University Research and Extension Centers.  Results of these trials are summarized in the following tables.  Wheat agronomic and quality ratings are presented in Tables 1 and 2, yield, protein and test weight data are presented in Tables 3 and 4. Durum agronomic and quality ratings are presented in Table 5a, 5b and 5c, yield, protein and test weight are presented in Tables 6 and 7.  Barley agronomic ratings are presented in Table 8 and yield, protein, test weight and plump data are presented in Tables 9a and 9b.

The 2001 growing season was characterized by unfavorable conditions at several research locations.  Trial data at Hettinger was lost due to severe hail in early July. Trial data was also lost due to severe lodging in Langdon, Fargo, and Prosper.  Use of data from trials at these locations would increase the incidence of making errors when selecting a variety.  Data from 2000 was reported for those sites where 2001 data was not reported.

Successful wheat, durum and barley production depends on multiple factors including selecting the right variety for a particular area. The information included in this publication is meant to aid in selecting that variety or group of varieties. The data is only meant to make relative comparisons of performance among varieties.

Characteristics to evaluate in selecting a variety are: yield potential in your area; protein content when grown with proper fertility;  straw strength and plant height; reaction to important diseases; and maturity.

When selecting a top yielding variety it is best to use data that summarizes several years and locations. The notion that the single data set nearest your farm will indicate which variety will perform the best for you is incorrect. Choose the variety that on average performs the best at multiple locations near you over several years.

Variety selection not only impacts production, but in the long term can impact markets.  The collective variety choices of producers have as great an impact on quality conscience markets, particularly international markets, as any other single factor.  Selecting varieties with good processing quality is essential to maintain market recognition.

Performance information coordinated by Michael Peel.

<

Table 1. 2002 North Dakota Hard Red Spring wheat variety descriptions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reaction to Disease 2

Quality Factors

Variety

Agent or
Orgin 1

Year Released

Beard

Height

Straw
Strength

Maturity

Stem
Rust

Leaf
Rust

Foliar
Disease

Root
Rot

Head
Scab

Test
Wt.

Pro.

Qual.
Rating

Coteau

ND

1978

yes

med

m. strg

med

R

 

M

MS

MS

avg.

high

good

Stoa

ND

1984

yes

med

m.strg.

m. early

R

MR

MS

M

MS

high

avg.

avg.

Butte 86

ND

1986

yes

med

med

early

R

MS

MS

MS

MS

high

avg.

avg

Amidon

ND

1988

yes

med

med

med

R

R

M

MR

S

high

avg.

avg.

Grandin

ND

1989

yes

sdwf

strg.

early

R

S

S

M

S

high

avg.

good

2370

NDSURF

1990

yes

sdwf

v. strg

m. early

R

N/A

S

S

MS*

high

avg.

poor-avg.

2375

NDSURF

1990

yes

sdwf

med

m.early

R

S

S

M

MS*

high

avg

poor-avg

Sharp

SD

1990

yes

med

med

early

R

MS

MS

S

MS*

high

avg

good

AC Barrie

Can

1994

no

med

med

med

R

S

M

M

M

high

avg

good

Kulm

ND

1994

yes

med

strg

early

R

MR

MS

MS

S

high

avg

avg-good

2398

NDSURF

1995

yes

sdwf

strg

m. late

R

S

MR

MS

VS

avg.

low

poor

Ernest

ND

1995

yes

med

med

med

R

MS

MS

MR

S

high

high

poor-avg

Glupro

ND

1995

yes

tall

med

m. late

R

MS

S

N/A

VS

avg

v. high

good

Gunner

AgriPro

1995

yes

med

m. strg

med

R

MS

MR

S

M

high

high

avg-good

Hamer

AgriPro

1995

yes

sdwf

v. strg

med

R

MR

M

N/A

S

avg.

avg

poor

Lars

AgriPro

1995

yes

sdwf

v. strg

med

R

R

MR

N/A

S

avg

low

poor

McNeal

MT

1995

yes

med

strg

m. early

MS

S

M

M

VS

avg

avg

poor-avg

Russ

SD

1995

yes

med

med

m. early

R

R

S

S

S*

avg

avg

avg

Trenton

ND

1995

yes

med

med

med

R

MR

MS

S

S*

high

avg

avg

Verde

MN

1995

yes

sdwf

strg

med

R

MR

MR

M

MS*

avg

low

poor

Keene

ND

1996

yes

med

med

med

R

R

MR

M

S

high

avg

avg

Oxen

SD

1996

yes

sdwf

strg

m. earlyr

R

R

S

S

S

avg

avg

avg-good

Forge

SD

1997

yes

sdwf

m. strg

early

R

S

MR

MS

MS

high

low

poor-avg

Nora

AgriPro

1997

yes

sdwf

strg

med

R

MS

MS

S

S

avg

high

avg

Argent 3

ND

1998

yes

sdwf

strg

early

R

S

S

S

S

high

avg

good

Hagar

AgriPro

1998

yes

sdwf

strg

med

R

MS

M

N/A

S

avg

low

poor-avg

HJ98

MN

1998

yes

sdwf

strg

m. early

R

MS

MS

MS

MS

avg

low

poor

Ingot

SD

1998

yes

sdwf

med

early

R

R

S

M

MS*

high

avg

poor-avg

Dandy

N. Star. G.

1998

yes

sdwf

v.strg

early

R

S

MS

S

S

high

avg

poor

McKenzie

Cenex

1998

yes

med

med

m. early

R

R

S

MS

S

high

avg

poor-avg

Parshall

ND

1999

yes

med

strg

m. early

R 4

MS

M

M

M

high

avg

good

Reeder

ND

1999

yes

sdwf

strg

m. early

R

MR

M

M

S

high

avg.

avg

McVey

MN

1999

yes

med

med

med

R

S

S

N/A

M

low

low

poor

Ivan

AgriPro

1999

yes

sdwf

v. strg

med

R

MR

S

MS

MS

high

low

poor

Ember

SDSU

1999

yes

sdwf

med

m. early

R

S

S

N/A

MS

high

low

poor

Aurora

N. Star G.

1999

yes

sdwf

strg

m. early

R

R

S

N/A

S

low

low

poor

Mercury

N. Star G.

1999

yes

sdwf

strg

m. early

R

MR

S

MS

S

avg

low

poor-avg

Norpro

AgriPro

1999

yes

sdwf

strg

med

R

R

S

MS

MS

avg

avg

poor

AC Intrepid

Canterra

1999

ne

med

med

med

R

R

N/A

N/A

S

N/A

N/A

N/A

Prodigy

Sask. Wht Pl

1999

yes

med

med

med

MR

MR

N/A

N/A

MR

N/A

N/A

N/A

Scholar

MT

1999

yes

med

med

med

R

S

N/A

N/A

S