Issue 40
November 2001

Library

Home

E-Mail

Back

Prairie Grains is the official publication of the Minnesota Association of Wheat Growers, North Dakota Grain Growers Association and South Dakota Wheat, Inc.

Copyright Prairie Grains Magazine November 2001

Minnesota Oats Variety Trials

By Deon Stuthman, Roger Caspers, Richard Halstead

Crown rust (Puccinia sp.) infections continue to be the major risk for oat production.  This year we are dividing the rust reading into two columns: one headed with “Amount Infected” and the other with “Reaction Type” (see Table 9). The value in the amount column predicts the relative proportion of initial rust spores that achieve a successful infection. The reaction type value indicates the size of the pustule or alternatively how much the pustule is restricted by the host reaction. Either way, a small and/or restricted pustule produces fewer spores for re-infection that begins about 8-10 days after the initial infection. Depending upon the plant growth stage at initial infection, there can be 1 to 3 cycles of re-infection during an oat-growing season.  The final amount of rust infection depends upon the number and size of spore-producing pustules that will produce the spores for the second and subsequent infections.  It is these infections that really cause the damage.

Yield data for oats is presented in Tables 6 and 7. Agronomic data and disease responses are presented in Tables 8 and 9. For all 40 entries of the variety trial, yields in 2001 were highest at Morris (113 bu/A), and Waseca (103 bu/A), and lowest at Rosemount (67 bu/A). Planting was delayed at most locations because of excess soil moisture.  Planting began at Waseca on April 19 and finished at Stephen on May 31. Dry weather and extremely high temperatures during the last half of June and much of July negatively impacted some varieties.  In 2001, ‘Vista’ from the University of Wisconsin was again the highest yielding cultivar, followed by ‘AC Assiniboa’ from Agriculture & Food Canada in Manitoba and ‘Richard’ from the University of Minnesota.

Table 6. Relative grain yield of oat varieties in Minnesota in multiple year comparisons.

 

Rosemount

Waseca

Lamberton

Morris

Crookston

Gr. Rapids

State

 

2yr

4yr

2yr

3yr 2

2yr

4yr

2yr

4yr

2yr

4yr

2yr

3yr 3

2yr 4

4yr 5

Variety 1

% of mean

Maraine

103

-

112

-

99

-

84

-

95

-

87

-

92

-

Chaps

99

103

108

108

90

96

103

109

98

94

107

110

100

101

Jay

98

100

110

102

96

86

102

110

96

98

90

92

97

99

Richard

103

104

107

101

110

103

105

101

100

103

103

109

105

102

Gem

99

100

107

105

110

111

106

104

101

100

94

99

103

104

Wabasha

99

107

95

101

97

99

101

106

106

111

98

103

100

106

Rodeo

108

110

101

102

97

101

118

116

101

104

116

113

108

108

Kildeer

92

-

101

-

97

-

93

-

95

-

115

-

98

-

Vista

117

-

126

-

111

-

111

-

111

-

96

-

109

-

Milton

106

102

104

96

96

93

87

95

94

98

102

102

96

97

Sesqui

108

112

107

106

103

100

106

105

113

115

99

104

106

107

Youngs

101

-

97

-

98

-

98

-

94

-

95

-

97

-

Jud

98

104

100

92

104

109

96

89

96

92

123

116

102

97

Loyal

95

95

109

105

104

102

104

95

102

99

107

102

103

97

Belle

100

99

108

103

106

102

90

93

101

99

95

96

98

97

Paul (hulless)

54

52

41

55

62

72

69

64

78

76

54

43

65

67

Ebeltoft

102

-

90

-

101

-

110

-

108

-

110

-

107

-

AC Assiniboia

101

-

109

-

105

-

111

-

105

-

101

-

105

-

LSD (0.05)

11

8

13

10

15

11

13

11

12

10

17

13

6

5

Mean (bu/A)

75

77

103

91

90

99

131

140

107

118

83

93

97

109

1 Varieties are listed from earliest to latest heading date.
2   Waseca data from 1998, 1999, and 2000 only.
3   Grand Rapids data from 1998, 2000, and 2001 only.
4   State averages do not include Waseca.
5   State averages do not include Waseca or Grand Rapids.

Table 7. Relative grain yield of oat varieties in Minnesota in single year (2001) comparisons at five on farm locations.

 

Roseau

Stephen

Winona 2

Wells 2

Madison 2

Avg

Variety 1

% of mean

Moraine

85

107

96

129

87

101

Chaps

101

110

98

111

100

103

Jay

101

94

112

114

106

104

Richard

100

103

104

94

126

101

Gem

97

105

118

122

115

110

Wabasha

94

96

92

104

110

96

Rodeo

88

97

104

124

145

105

Kildeer

74

124

91

114

125

101

Vista

102

131

120

110

97

113

Milton

92

81

104

99

84

93

Sesqui

108

111

112

101

138

109

Youngs

124

68

87

92

58

89

Jud

104

102

91

76

92

93

Loyal

133

103

102

98

93

107

Belle

99

116

104

98

96

103

Paul (hulless)

99

74

67

28

58

66

Ebeltoft

110

97

89

107

116

100

AC Assiniboia

106

126

110

79

95

104

Riser

-

-

-

-

59

-

AC Rebel

83

58

-

-

-

-

LSD (0.05)

26

20

18

24

32

8

Mean (bu/A)

72

65

89

58

52

82

1 Varieties are listed from earlist to latest heading date.
2 Pesticid free/orgainic production; Madison was also no-till.

Table 8.  Agronomic characteristics of oat varieties in
Minnesota in multiple year comparisons (2000-2001).

Variety 1

Days to Heading
(days)

Plant Height (inches)

Straw Strength 2

Test Weight (lbs/bu)

Groat %

Moraine

58

40

1.9

38.8

70.8

Chaps

59

39

2.2

38.0

68.3

Jay

59

35

1.6

38.1

68.2

Richard

59

43

2.0

38.6

69.5

Gem

60

41

2.5

37.8

68.5

Wabasha

60

41

2.1

38.3

70.5

Rodeo

60

40

1.9

37.2

69.6

Kildeer

61

37

2.4

39.2

70.5

Vista

61

43

3.0

38.7

70.6

Milton

61

38

1.6

38.1

69.2

Sesqui

62

40

2.5

39.0

67.4

Youngs

63

44

2.1

37.9

70.4

Jud

64

46

3.3

38.9

70.0

Loyal

64

45

3.3

39.2

68.1

Belle

64

40

2.3

39.2

72.7

Paul (hulless)

65

43

2.5

43.4

93.1

Ebeltoft

65

38

2.5

38.5

70.7

AC Assiniboia

65

42

1.9

38.8

73.5

Mean

62

41

2.3

38.8

71.2

1 Varieties are listed from earliest to latest heading date
2 1 = excellant 5 = poor