Issue 59
Prairie Grains

Library

Home

E-Mail

Back

Prairie Grains is the official publication of the Minnesota Association of Wheat Growers, North Dakota Grain Growers Association, Montana Grain Growers Association and South Dakota Wheat, Inc.

Copyright Prairie Grains Magazine
March 2004

Notes from 2004 Barley Day, Minot, N.D.

Why Protein, Germ Limits Are Important
John Zietz, barley supply chain manager, Cargill Malt, Spiritwood, N.D., says the very definition of “malting” helps explain the need for stringent specifications for buying malting barley at the farm level.

He says malting is “a controlled germination of a cereal grain to produce enzymes and to cause defined changes in its chemical constituents.” That means that the primary grain used in the process – malting barley – needs to have a specified level of characteristics – such as protein levels of less than 13 to 13.5%, and germination greater than 95% – for the malting process to be successful.

Barley that germinates poorly is basically kernels that are dead, Zietz points out.  If they don’t grow, they don’t activate properly in the malting process. Non-germinating kernels result in wasted product, higher production costs, inconsistent analytical results in malt, and ultimately, off-flavors in beer.  Proper and timely harvesting, storage and handling can go a long way to minimize germination problems, he says.

High protein barley can also cause all sorts of problems in the malting process, including reduced levels of malt extract, off-color, more phenolics in the wort contributing to astringent beer flavors haze formation, product instability, even lower foam quality.

Barley segregated by protein levels and other quality attributes allows for a more consistent malting process, he says.  Some brewers use protein levels greater than 14% in special cases, but those cases are limited in terms of total volume, he says.

Blending is not preferable to barley with the right specifications. High-low blending of barley creates problems in the malting process. Mixing 12% pro barley with 14% may yield a 13% average, “but every other kernel malts very differently,” he points out.

Growing malting barley varieties adapted to your geographic area, as well as soil testing and managing fertility accordingly, are keys to malting barley protein management.  See the article “Upping the Odds of Growing Malting Barley” for more production tips, online at www.smallgrains. org/springwh/Mar03/upp/upp.htm.

Recommended Malting Barley Varieties for ’04
The American Malting Barley Association, Inc. has announced its recommended malting barley varieties for planting in 2004, and encourages growers and grain handlers to maintain variety integrity and not mix them, as each barley variety malts differently and mixtures will not malt properly.

AMBA recommended varieties for Minn., N.D., S.D.
Conlon, Drummond, Excel, Foster, Lacey, Legacy, Morex, Robust, Tradition

AMBA recommended varieties for Montana
B1202, Conlon, Excel, Foster, Garnet, Harrington, Legacy, Merit, Morex, Robust, Stander, Tradition

AMBA notes on newer varieties:

Drummond, a six-row developed at NDSU, was rated satisfactory in plant scale evaluations by Anheuser-Busch, Inc. and Miller Brewing Co.

Lacey, a six-row developed at the U of M, was rated satisfactory in plant scale evaluation by Miller Brewing Co., which was the basis of its addition to the recommended list in 2002. Anheuser-Busch, Inc. has not completed its plant scale evaluation of Lacey.

Tradition, a six-row developed by Busch Agricultural Resources, Inc., was rated satisfactory in plant scale evaluation by Anheuser-Busch, Inc., which was the basis of its addition to the recommended list last year. Miller Brewing Co. has initiated plant scale evaluation of Tradition with 2003 crop production. 

Mean agronomic performance of six-rowed barley
varieties currently grown in North Dakota, 1999-2003

Variety

Days to HeadingDays after 5/31

Lodging (0-9) +

Stem Breakage (1-5) ++

Grain Yield (bu/ac)

Station years

18

6

9

18

Robust

25.5

3.3

3.3

84

Drummond

25.0

2.0

2.2

85

Legacy

27.0

2.6

3.1

90

Tradition

24.5

2.4

2.1

88

Lacey

24.5

2.7

2.7

88

+Lodging of 0 = no lodging and 9 = severe lodging.
++Stem breakage of 1 = no breakage at harvest and 5 = severe breakage at harvest.

Commodity Planning Price Projections for 2004
These estimated planning prices from NDSU can be used as a guide in setting price expectations for 2004 crop production. The planning prices can be used for preparing annual enterprise budgets and annual whole-farm cash flow projections.

CROP

PRICE

Spring Wheat

$3.37/bu

Durum Wheat

3.78/bu

Oats

1.31/bu

FeedBarley

1.76/bu

Malting Barley

2.32/bu

Oil Sunflower*

10.38/cwt

Non-Oil Sunflower

14.73/cwt

Corn

2.01/bu

Soybeans

5.15/bu

Canola**

9.34/cwt

Flaxseed**

5.23/bu

WinterWheat

2.99/bu

Dry Beans

17.00/cwt

Alfalfa Hay

$55.00/ton

Mixed Hay

$36.00/ton

Rye

2.07/bu

Potatoes

5.75/cwt

Overview of Crop Insurance for Malting Barley in ‘04

•  There are added replant payment benefits for barley, and added coverage and quality adjustment provisions for hull-less barley.

•  Maximum replant payment per acre is based on lesser of 20% of production guarantee or five bushels times the price election for barley.

•  Provisions provide replant payments even when seeding rates are less than original seeding rate when replanting a damaged stand.

•  Added RA Malting Barley in Montana and South Dakota.

•  Expanded malting coverage to all SD counties (MPCI & RA)

•  No policy changes this year in Malting Barley Price and Quality Endorsement.  Option A requires history/records of sales for four most recent crop years (2004 crop year needs records for 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999). Option B requires malting barley contract by June 30 acreage reporting date. The maximum additional value is the lesser of guaranteed sales price in malt contract minus feed barley price election or premium price in contract, not to exceed $2.00/bushel.

•  Income Protection/Revenue Assurance requires a Malting Barley Price Agreement (elevator contracts) and four years records of malting barley sales. Additional value based on the agreement, not to exceed $1.25.

Consult your local crop insurance agent for more details on insuring malting barley for 2004. 

Source: USDA-RMA, Billings, Mont.

North Central/Northwest North Dakota Barley Acres
(Pierce, McHenry, Bottineau, Renville, Ward, McLean, Mountrail,
Burke, Divide, Williams, McKenzie FSA reported acres)

Region

1992

1997*

2002* 

2003*

State

2.4 m

2.2 m

1.4 m

1.9 m

 

 

- 8%

-  42%

- 21%

NC/NW Region

500,000

496,000

408,000

606,000

 

21%

23%

29%

32%

 

 

-1%

-19%

+21%

*  Change from 1992

The Red River Valley is well-renowned for its crop production capabilities, but Kent McKay, NDSU extension area agronomist, Minot, points out that an 11-county area of north central and northwest N.D. (Pierce, McHenry, Bottineau, Renville, Ward, McLean, Mountrail, Burke, Divide, Williams, McKenzie) quietly accounts for 45% of the nation’s durum wheat production, 9% of the nation’s spring wheat production and another 9% of barley, 42% of U.S. canola, nearly a quarter of all sunflower, about one-third of the nation’s field peas and half of the nation’s flax. The figures are based on USDA-FSA reported acres.  One reason for this area’s crop prominence is the fact that disease problems have been generally less than in the Red River Valley, and the fact that corn and soybeans have squeezed out other crops in the Valley.

Malting Barley Price (at $2.29) Needed to Equalize Return to Land, Labor and Management for All Barley Production Compared to Competing Crops

 

Return to Land and Labor Manage ment

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

100%

 

 

---------------------Percent of Production Sold for Malting------------------------

Dry Beans

$111.85

$10.04

$7.67

$6.35

$5.51

$4.93

$4.50

$3.81

Conf. Sunflower

82.70

7.75

6.03

5.08

4.47

4.05

3.74

3.24

Yellow Mustard

70.36

6.78

5.34

4.54

4.03

3.67

3.41

2.99

Lentils

59.41

5.93

4.73

4.06

3.64

3.34

3.13

2.78

Oil Sunflower

56.39

5.69

4.56

3.93

3.53

3.25

3.05

2.72

Field Peas

44.57

4.76

3.90

3.41

3.11

2.90

2.74

2.49

Soybeans

40.19

4.42

3.65

3.22

2.95

2.76

2.63

2.40

Buckwheat

40.14

4.41

3.65

3.22

2.95

2.76

2.62

2.40

Malting Barley

34.46

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Winter Wheat

31.30

3.72

3.15

2.84

2.64

2.50

2.39

2.23

Millet

25.64

3.28

2.84

2.59

2.43

2.33

2.25

2.12

Flax

23.24

3.09

2.70

2.49

2.35

2.25

2.18

2.07

Spring Wheat

14.25

2.38

2.20

2.09

2.03

1.98

1.95

1.89

Durum

12.96

2.28

2.12

2.04

1.98

1.94

1.91

1.87

Canola

11.28

2.15

2.03

1.96

1.92

1.89

1.87

1.84

Corn

9.98

2.05

1.96

1.91

1.88

1.85

1.84

1.81

Feed Barley

5.91

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oats

 ($3.42)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Barley Yield

 

51

 

 

 

 

 

 

Feed Barley Price

 

1.73

 

 

 

 

 

 

These estimated budget figures for north central N.D. illustrate that the more barley that makes malting, the more malting barley can compete in profit potential with other crops.
Source: Dwight Aakre, NDSU extension farm management specialist