Issue 43
March 2002

Library

Home

E-Mail

Back

Prairie Grains is the official publication of the Minnesota Association of Wheat Growers, North Dakota Grain Growers Association and South Dakota Wheat, Inc.

Copyright Prairie Grains Magazine
March 2002

Evaluation of Copper for Hard Red Spring Wheat Production

By George Rehm, University of Minnesota Extension Soil Scientist

Copper (Cu), a micronutrient essential for crop production, is supplied in adequate amounts by most of Minnesota’s agricultural soils. The organic soils are an exception. Past research has shown that addition of this nutrient to a fertilizer program produces substantial increases in yields when small grains are grown on these soils.

More recently, there had been reports that use of Cu fertilizers had increased the yield of hard red spring wheat grown on mineral soils in Canada. After considering the Canadian reports, it seemed that an evaluation of Cu for hard red spring production on the mineral soils of northwestern Minnesota was appropriate.

This evaluation was conducted in the fields of six cooperating growers in 2000 and 2001. The location of the sites and the associated relevant soil properties are summarized in Table 1. Copper was supplied as two sources (chelate, sulfate) to provide 6 and 12 lb. Cu per acre. The Cu fertilizers along with fertilizers to supply adequate N, P2O5, and K2O were broadcast and incorporated before planting. The cooperating farmer planted the wheat. Appropriate herbicides were applied post emergence for weed control. Grain yields were measured with a plot combine. Yields were corrected to 13.5% moisture.

Except for the Norman County site in 2000, all soils had an organic matter content greater than 2%. The lower soil test values for Cu were associated with the soils that had the loamy fine sand texture. Grain yields are summarized in Table 2. The effect of only one rate of Cu (12 lb. per acre) is shown.

In the two years of the evaluation, Cu fertilization produced a significant increase in yield at only one location (Norman, 2000). Both sources of Cu had an equal effect on yield. Yields resulting from the use of 6 lb. Cu per acre were the same as yields produced by the use of 12 lb. Cu per acre.

In evaluating the response to Cu fertilization, it’s important to remember that the sandy site in Norman County in 2000 had an organic matter content of less than 2.0%.

The results from this study are consistent with those of similar studies in North Dakota. In those studies, a response to Cu fertilization was only measured where sandy soils had a low organic matter content.

The University of Minnesota recommendations for use of Cu will not change. This micronutrient will be recommended when small grains are grown on organic soils. Those who grow hard red spring wheat on sandy soils with an organic matter content of less than 2% may want to consider the broadcast application of 6 lb. Cu per acre as copper sulfate. There is no firm guarantee that this practice will increase yields.

Table 1. Relevant soil properties for the experimental sites used for the evaluation of Cu fertilizers.

Site

Year

Cu SoilTest (ppm)

Soil Texture

Norman

2000

0.36

loamy fine sand

East Polk

2000

0.88

silty clay loam

Marshall

2000

0.29

loamy fine sand

Norman

2001

0.30

 loamy fine sand

East Polk

2001

0.60

silty clay loam

West Polk

2001

0.30

loamy fine sand

Table 2. Yield of hard red spring wheat as affected by the application of 12 lb.  Cu per acre.

Site

Year

Cu Rate and Source

none 12

(sulfate) 12

(chelate)

bu/acre

Norman

2000

50.4a*

54.9b

57.2b

East Polk

2000

66.2a

61.9a

67.9a

Marshall

2000

47.4a

47.9a

51.1a

Norman

2001

45.2a

47.3a

40.8a

East Polk

2001

57.0a

55.5a

55.9a

West Polk

2001

59.5a

59.6a

60.7a

* Treatment means in any row followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the confidence level.