Issue 41
January 2002

Library

Home

E-Mail

Back

Prairie Grains is the official publication of the Minnesota Association of Wheat Growers, North Dakota Grain Growers Association and South Dakota Wheat, Inc.

Copyright Prairie Grains Magazine January 2002

2001 Red River Valley On-Farm Yield Trials

Following are the results of the 2001 Red River Valley On-Farm Yield Trials. These regional trials were located throughout northwestern Minnesota.  Yield trials for Crookston, Morris and St. Paul were included in the November-December Issue of Prairie Grains, and can be viewed online at www.prairiegrains.com.

About the Trials:
The 2001 Red River Valley On-Farm Yield Trials were grown in 8 locations throughout the region. The locations, cooperators, and planting dates are summarized in Table 1. This year prooved to be a difficult year for conducting high-quality yield trials. Wet weather caused delays in planting and problems with seedbed preparation especially in the northern locations. The trial at Humboldt consequently was not harvested.

Table 1: Locations of the 2001 Red River Valley On-Farm Yield Trials

Location

Cooperator

Planting Date

1 Fergus Falls

Don Vigen

05-01-01

2 Ulen

Wayne Zimmerman

05-11-01

3 Perley

Brian Hest

05-03-01

4 Brooks

Ray Swenson

05-10-01

5 Stephen

Leif Aakre

05-18-01

6 Thief River Falls

Curtis W. Swanson

05-16-01

7 Strathcona

Jim kukowski

05-16-01

8 Humboldt

Gerald Olsonowski

05-18-01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About the Entries:
The entries of the 2001 Red River On-Farm Yield Trials, including the breeder and the year of release, are listed in Table 2. Two new and recently released cultivars were added for 2000: ‘AC Vista’, a hard white spring wheat from Agriculture and Food Canada and ‘Ozzie’ from Trigen Genetics. Testing of ‘AC Barrie’ and ‘Lars’ was discontinued.

Table 2: Hard Red Spring Wheat entries in the Red River On-Farm Yield Trials (1999-2001).

Breeder

Cultivar

Year Released

1999

2000

2001

Agriculture Canada

AC Vista

1997

 

 

x

AgriPro

Gunner

1996

x

x

x

AgriPro

Ivan

1998

x

x

x

AgriPro

NorPro

2000

 

x

x

Cropland Genetics

McKenzie

1998

 

x

x

Northstar Genetics

Mercury

1998

 

x

x

Northstar Genetics

Dandy

1999

 

x

x

NDSU

Parshall

1999

x

x

x

NDSU

Reeder

1999

x

x

x

NDSU

Alsen

2000

 

x

x

Pioneer Hi-bred

2375

1990

x

x

x

SDSU

Oxen

1996

x

x

x

SDSU

Russ

1995

x

x

x

SDSU

Forge

1997

x

x

x

SDSU

Ingot

1998

x

x

x

SDSU

Walworth

2000

 

 

x

TriGen Genetics

Ozzie

1999

 

 

x

Univ. of Minnesota

Marshall

1982

x

x

x

Univ. of Minnesota

Verde

1995

x

x

x

Univ. of Minnesota

HJ98

1998

x

x

x

Univ. of Minnesota

McVey

1999

x

x

x

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interpretation of the Data:
This year one-year, two and three-year averages are reported. Within the table, the varieties are listed in the order of their maturity. No single location data is presented to avoid misinterpretation of data. Single environment data has to be interpreted with caution.

Performance data across multiple environments; either single location/multiple year, or multiple location/single year, and/or a combination of years and locations is more reliable. Performance data of individual locations is only available upon request. No data may be reproduced without written consent of the author.

In each table, the three highest performers for each trait are printed in bold. The grain yield in each table is expressed as a percentage of the trial mean with the overall mean in bu/A listed below. Presenting the data this way allows for better comparisons over years. Secondly, variety selection is based on the relative ranking of the cultivars, rather than the absolute yield.

Comparisons between varieties should only be made within each column and not between columns or between tables. In addition to the overall mean for the trial, the Least Significant Difference is printed at the bottom of each column. The LSD is calculated using an alpha level of 5%. This indicates that, if and when the observed difference between two varieties is larger than the LSD unit, with 95% confidence the observed difference is a real difference rather than experimental error.

 

Table 3.  Relative yield expressed as a percentage of the trial mean across alllocations 2001 and multi-year (1999-2001) comparisons and agronomic characteristics of cultivars entered in the Red River Valley On-Farm Yield Trials

 

 

 

 

3 Year Data

 

 

1-year

2-year

3-year

Height

Lodge

Tst. Wt

Pro

Variety

% of Mean

(Inches)

(1-5)

(lbs/bu)

(%)

Forge

100.9

97.7

103.4

33.2

2.3

58.4

14.0

Ingot

99.3

98.7

107.4

35.4

2.8

60.7

14.8

Oxen

108.1

103.8

115.5

31.8

1.9

57.8

14.7

P2375

101.9

99.5

07.1

31.8

3.7

58.7

14.5

Alsen

96.3

93.0

-

-

-

-

-

Dandy

105.9

103.4

-

-

-

-

-

Walworth

108.5

-

-

-

-

-

-

McKenzie

89.8

88.8

-

-

-

-

-

Mercury

106.8

108.3

-

-

-

-

-

Parshall

95.2

93.5

101.1

35.9

2.1

59.6

14.9

Reeder

104.9

103.0

109.9

33.1

1.8

57.5

15.0

Russ

98.8

97.9

110.7

34.4

2.5

57.5

14.4

HJ98

96.0

104.3

109.3

31.8

3.5

56.9

14.3

NorPro

104.9

107.2

-

-

-

-

-

Verde

97.1

100.2

107.3

32.0

2.2

57.9

13.9

Ivan

101.0

105.6

116.3

31.2

1.5

57.7

13.4

Ozzie

88.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

Marshall

95.9

98.9

101.5

30.5

2.5

56.4

14.2

McVey

100.4

106.5

113.6

33.1

3.4

56.2

13.3

Gunner

93.1

89.8

89.1

34.5

2.3

58.0

15.6

AC Vista*

101.3

-

-

-

-

-

-

LSD (5%)

9.7

6.4

7.7

0.7

-

0.7

0.3

Mean (bu/A)

59.8

66.7

55.5

-

-

-

-

* AC Vista is a hard white spring wheat.