Library Home
E-Mail
Back
Prairie Grains is the
official publication of
the Minnesota
Association of
Wheat Growers,
North Dakota Grain
Growers Association,
South Dakota Wheat,
Inc., and the
Minnesota Barley
Growers Association.
|
Roller
coaster" might best describe the 1995 growing season
for small grains: there were thrills (price) and scares
(delayed planting, heat, the threat of scab, to name a
few). Generally, the ride didnt measure up to what
we anticipated and were just relieved its
over. A cold, wet spring
combined with many acres that did not get worked or
harvested in 1994, resulted in a very late start. Most
grains were planted in the third and fourth week of May;
some growers even planted wheat as late as the second
week of July. Although there were exceptions,
later-seeded small grains generally yielded less and were
of poorer quality than earlier-seeded small grains.
The effect of the delayed start
was intensified by the hot weather in June, which caused
moisture stress and a faster rate of development. The
result of the 90-degree-plus heat was fewer tillers and
smaller heads per tiller for small grains, which as cool
season grasses prefer temperatures around 65 degrees. In
some cases the heat even caused sterility in the head.
Junes hot weather also
contributed to weed problems. In many instances herbicide
applications were delayed or even canceled to avoid crop
injury or stress in young plants. Also, thin crop stands
caused by the heat allowed weed flushes to flourish later
in the season.
Cold, wet weather shrouded the
Red River Valley in early July, and it looked like our
familiar fungal nightmare could be back. Initially, a lot
of the bleached glumes were the result of the June heat
rather than scab. Make no mistake, however, scab affected
its share of wheat and barley again but generally, was
less severe than the previous two years.
Small grain losses to scab in
Minnesota averaged about 8 percent in 1995, according to
Roger Jones, U of M extension plant pathologist. He
compares that with an estimated average scab loss of 18
percent in 1994, and 33 percent in 1993.
As the season progressed, July
settled down a bit. Many were led to believe that the
later-planted crop would yield better than the earlier
planted fields which suffered more during the heat. This
generally was not the case, however.
Stem and leaf rust were not
significant and only showed up at the tail end of the
season in some of the barley fields. Septoria and tan
spot developed slowly, but later the picture changed
quickly as temperatures dropped and rain showers provided
enough moisture to allow the diseases to develop.
A majority of wheat acres in
Minnesota was planted to 2375 and Grandin. Both varieties
perform above average with regard to scab, but are below
average for the leaf disease complex of Septoria and tan
spot. Further, it should be noted that 2375 is more
susceptible to shattering than other varieties, and it is
not a good competitor under weed pressure.
Some growers did apply
fungicides to suppress scab. In U of M fungicide trials,
preliminary results showed that the combination of
Benlate and mancozeb, two of the primary options
available, suppressed scab as well as reduced the effects
of Septoria and tan spot. Grandin responded particularly
well. More details on fungicide response trials will be
available this winter.
Insects caused very few problems
in small grains this year, with the exception of the
Orange Wheat Blossom Midge, which was more of a problem
in North Dakota. In Pembina and Ramsey Counties, the
yield reduction because of the insect averaged about 25
percent, and in some cases rose as high as 90 percent.
The problem could appear again next year, given the right
conditions. Careful scouting for this insect is needed
between late boot and early flowering.
Weather has thrown its share of
wrenches into our narrow time windows for weed management
the last few growing seasons, and that was very evident
this past harvest. Fields greened up with foxtail, wild
oats, and barnyard grass, among others, and it was not
uncommon to drive by weedy fields and not be able to tell
what was planted in them.
To enable harvest, many growers
climbed aboard swathers while others opted for a chemical
dry-down by spraying a herbicide prior to harvest. I know
of one farmer who sprayed 5,000 acres; "it was the
only way I could combine," he said.
Early on, quality was good and
yield respectable, but as the Minnesota and eastern N.D.
wheat harvest progressed, yields did not increase and the
quality decreased. Ergot and sprout damage became
problems. The amount of scab in many lots increased to
around 15 percent, with test weights dipping into the mid
fifties. The barley crop was not much better; many
samples tested showed low levels of DON or vomitoxin,
making it difficult to meet malting standards.
This winter, be sure to review
your small grain varieties. Compare performance notes
from your own farm with varietal trial information
elsewhere, such as in this magazine, and make changes if
necessary. Also, learn as much as you can about the crop
pests which caused problems in 1995 or which may be a
threat in 1996. A good source for information is your
county extension educator office. Bulletins available
there address a number of production topics. Get
reference material now so its on hand when you
dont have time to run for it in the rush of the
next growing season.
|