U of M Varietal Trials for 1995 Small Grains
Barley Tables

 

Table 1. Grain yield of barley varieties in bushels per acre for three periods;
1988-95, 1992-95, and 1995
Location
Variety Crookston Morris Stephen St. Paul Roseau Mean
  1988-1995
  181 14 2 12 6 52
Morex
Robust
Excel
Stander
LSD 0.05		 88
95
108
107
3		 71
77
85
82
3		 56
67
76
75
10		 84
88
94
97
3		 79
92
100
105
8		 80
87
96
96
2
  1992-1995
  71 4 -- 2 -- 13
Robust
Excel
Stander
Foster
LSD 0.05		 90
105
105
98
4		 90
100
103
90
5		 --
--
--
--
--		 86
97
105
99
7		 --
--
--
--
--		 90
102
104
96
3
  1995
  31 2 -- 1 -- 6
Robust
Excel
Stnader
Foster
LSD 0.05		 85
106
104
93
6		 85
98
97
89
7		 --
--
--
--
--		 80
93
103
90
10		 --
--
--
--
--		 84
102
102
91
4
1 Nuumber trials

 

Table 2. Agronomic traits and net blotch resistance scores of barley varieties, 1989-95
Variety Heading
(June)		 Height
(inches)		 Lodging
(%)		 Plump kernels
(5)		 Net blotch
(1-5)1
  282 29 12 37 8
Morex
Robust
Excel
Stander
Foster3		 19
20
21
21
21		 34
34
32
31
31		 55
39
33
27
36		 69
77
67
77
76		 5
4
4
4
--
11 is best; 2 number trials; 3 limited "adjusted data"

 

Table 3. Agronomic traits of semidwarf barley Royal compared to Robust and Stander, 1993-95
  Height
(inches)		 Yield
(bu/a)		 Lodging
(%)		 Plump Kernels
(%)
Robust
Stander
Royal		 32
30
28		 89
104
94		 37
29
21		 74
79
71