U of M Varietal Trials for 1995 Small Grains
Tables for Hard Red Spring Wheat

Table A.
Yields of hard red spring wheat varieties1 in Minnesota, 1993-95
  Northern Southern State
Variety 95
(2)2
93-95
(8)
95
(3)
93-95
(9)
95
(5)
93-95
(17)
Sharp
Kulm
Butte 86
Russ
2375
2370
Grandin
Stoa
Verde
Norm3
Wheaton3
Marshall
Nordic
Trenton4
Hamer4
Lars4
Norlander4
LSD 5%
42
39
42
45
42
45
40
43
44
42
38
45
45
41
43
45
48
9
39
40
36
41
43
42
36
40
40
35
36
38
38
38
40
41
42
4
55
57
56
62
61
59
59
49
59
57
53
54
48
58
63
59
52
7
48
51
48
53
52
50
47
41
50
48
45
43
42
49
57
54
52
5
50
50
50
55
53
53
51
47
53
49
47
50
49
52
55
54
57
6
44
46
43
48
48
46
42
41
46
43
41
40
40
45
50
49
48
3
1 Only new varieties and older varieties with scab ratings better than susceptible are included in trials. 2 () No. of environments. 3 Varieties included as scab susceptible checks. 4 1994 and 1995 data only adjusted to 1993-95.

 

Table B. Characteristics of hard red spring wheat varieties1, 1993-95
        Leaf Stem Foliar Scab Test Wheat Milling/Backing
Variety Heading Height Lodging2 Rust Rust Disease3 Severity Tolerance4 Weight Protein5 Quality
  date inches   rating6     lbs/bu %  
Sharp
Kulm
Butte 86
Russ
2375
2370
Grandin
Stoa
Verde
Norm7
Wheaton7
Marshall
Nordic
Trenton8
Hamer8
Lars8
Norlander8
6-23
6-23
6-24
6-25
6-25
6-25
6-25
6-27
6-27
6-27
6-28
6-28
6-28
6-26
6-26
6-27
6-23
33
35
33
33
31
31
32
36
31
31
29
31
32
36
31
28
31
3.6
3.0
2.9
3.9
4.5
2.6
2.7
3.8
2.2
1.9
2.8
1.9
2.5
3.4
2.0
2.3
2.2
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MS
R
R
MR
R
R
MR
MR
R
MR
MR
MR
R
R
R
MR
R
MR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
MR
R
R
MS
MS
S
S
-
S
S
S
MS
-
MR
MR
MS
MR
MS
MR
MR
MS
MS
MS
MS
MS
MR
MS
MS
MS
MS
S
S
MS
MS
S
MS
MS
S
3
3
4
3
1
3
2
3
2
5
5
2
2
2
3
4
5
58.5
57.5
57.0
56.2
57.9
56.0
57.3
55.3
56.0
54.2
51.7
56.1
55.1
57.0
56.0
54.6
55.5
15.0
15.4
15.1
14.7
14.9
14.7
15.5
15.2
14.4
14.1
13.8
14.1
13.5
15.4
14.5
14.2
14.7
Med-high
High-med
Med-high
Med
Med
Med
High
Med-high
Med
Med-high
Low-med
Med-low
Low
High-med
Med-low
Med-low
Med
1 Only new varieties and older narieties with scab ratings better than susceptible are included in trials. 2 Rated 1 = erect, 9 = flat. 3 Rating based on NDSU data from 1993-95. 4 Tolerance to maintain plump kernels under scab conditions; 1 = very will, 5= poor. 5 12% moisture. 6 R = resistant; MR = moderately resistant; MS = moderately susceptible; S = susceptible.
7
Varieties included as checks. 8 1994 and 1995 data adjusted to 1993-95.

 

Table C. Varieties rated highly susceptible to scab
2371
2398
Bergen
Dalen
Gus
Krona
Minnpro
Norm
Prospect
Sonja
Vance
Wheaton