Navigation Image Map
 

News from the Minnesota Association of Wheat
Growers for Friday, June 16,  2000

WHEAT PROJECTION
The June/July "Agriculture Outlook" (a bi-monthly publication by the USDA Economic Research Service) arrived today.  The lead story is entitled "Large Field Crop Supplies Expected Again in 2000/01."  Here is what it says about wheat:

"Large supplies of major U.S. field crops are expected again in 2000/01, keeping downward pressure on season-average farm prices for the fourth consecutive year, according to USDA's first forecast of production and prices for next year.  Wheat deviates from the general output projection, with production expected to decline 3 percent and season-average farm price to rise 6 percent (midpoint of forecast range)."

"U.S. wheat planting for the 2000 crop are expected to decline for the fourth consecutive year as producers continue to favor planting oilseeds in many parts of the Corn Belt and Northern Plains states.  As a result, production is projected to fall nearly 3 percent, but large carry-in stocks will keep supplies relatively plentiful.  With higher wheat imports anticipated next year, the total U.S. wheat supply is expected to be down less than 2 percent from 1999."

"Total use of wheat is projected to rise slightly as gains in food use and exports offset a decline in feed use - reflecting competition from weak corn prices.  The U.S. is expected to capture a share of this year's expanding global import market, a result of production decreases in North Africa and Iran (due to drought) and in China.  Given relatively flat total use, smaller U.S. supplies will likely lead to lower ending stocks, and the U.S. average wheat price for 2000/01 is expected to rise $0.15 per bushel to $2.65 (midpoint of forecast)."

The report also contains a chart showing that the ending stocks in 1999/2000 were 938 million bushels are projected to be 837 million bushels in 2000/01.

Ending stocks are projected to go up for all other field crops (corn, sorghum, barley, soybeans, rice and cotton) with the exception of oats.

Wayne Hammon - Director of Government Relations
National Association of Wheat Growers
415 Second Street, NE - Suite 300
Washington, DC 20002 - 202-547-7800

 

 

AUSTRALIAN CANOLA CROP FORECAST CUT ON DRY WEATHER
SYDNEY, June 15 (Reuters) - According to Reuters, the Australian Canola Association has cut its forecast of canola production this season by seven percent from its last forecast because of lack of planting rain in Western Australia.

The forecast of total Australian canola production for 2000 has been reduced to 1.835 million tonnes, down from 1.975 tonnes in the association's last forecast in May.

Australia's total canola production in 1999 was a record 2.4 million tonnes, confirming the country's position as the world's second-largest canola exporter after Canada.

Lack of planting rain in much of Western Australia had reduced the national crop area estimate for 2000 to 1.415 million hectares, down from the previous month's estimate of 1.5 million.

 

 

CONTRARY REPORTS ON THE CHINESE WHEAT CROP
Contrary to industry indications, the USDA's agricultural attaché in Beijing suggests there was "minimal" effects on the 2000-01 Chinese wheat crop due to dry conditions.  According to a recently released report, the attaché suggests last fall's planting and emergence went well and moisture levels in the early spring growing season were "good".  Sources indicate the report maintains a forecast for China's 2000-01 wheat production of 107 MMT, up 3.0 MMT from the USDA's June forecast.  This estimate would be sharply lower than China's final 1999 production, but the attaché attributes the reduction to low domestic prices which discouraged planted wheat acreage.

Moreover, newswire sources suggest wheat crop maturation and harvest activity are gaining momentum in the northern wheat areas of China due to warm, dry weather conditions.  Meanwhile, low soil moisture levels in the Yellow River Basin have helped advance field work progress.  Sources anticipate the dryness has also hurt wheat production potential, although just how much of the crop actually suffered yield loss remains unclear at this point.  Furthermore, spring wheat in far northeastern China is developing well, but there are some dryness concerns as widespread rain is needed to maintain "normal" maturation.

 

 

WASHINGTON DONATES WHEAT TO NORTH KOREA                                                                        
By Randy Fabi 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - According to Reuters, the Clinton administration said Thursday it donated 50,000 tons of U.S. wheat to the World Food Program's emergency feeding effort in North Korea, one day after an historic meeting of North and South Korea's leaders

The outcome of the summit, which President Clinton applauded saying he was ``very pleased,'' is expected to pave the way for the U.S. to ease sanctions against North Korea, as announced by Clinton last September.    

The wheat donation was part of the United Nation's food group appeal last April for 584,619 tonnes of food aid to its famine-stricken 22.5 million inhabitants for use from June 1999 through July 2000.

 Last month, North Korean officials asked wealthy nations for an additional $250 million to help them achieve food self-sufficiency by 2002.   

A U.S. congressional report recently estimated that up to two million people in North Korea -- almost 10 percent of the population -- may have died from malnutrition and related diseases since 1995, when floods, drought and mismanagement of the state farm system devastated the rural economy.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                      ``Given the severe food shortages that continue in North Korea, the United States is responding to the World Food Program's latest appeal for emergency humanitarian assistance,'' U.S. Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman said in a statement.                                                                                  

 The U.S. wheat donation, valued at an estimated $12.8 million, will be used to make noodles and other food products to be distributed to children, pregnant and nursing mothers, hospital patients and other vulnerable groups, the USDA said.                                         

 

 

FLOODING ON WHEAT AND BARLEY
Due to several requests I have attempted to assemble a little information on the impact of flooding.  Most information in the literature is relative to water logging and not flooding.

The first major impact of soil completely covered with water is a rapid depletion of oxygen required for plant growth and development.  The other major impact of flooding is change in nutrient status either by leaching or changing their availability to the plant.  The response to flooding will vary with duration, and temperature.

Obviously the longer the duration of the flooding the greater the injury.  The major injury results from plants trying to grow in an anaerobic environment.  While specific information on how long small grains can survive under water has not been frequently reported, most indications are that wheat can withstand water logged soils for up to 24 hours with out excessive damage, barley is less that this.  Depending on the conditions wheat can probably survive saturated conditions for up to two days.  Conditions that influence this are temperature and stage of growth.  Under cool conditions metabolic activity is less than at warm temperatures and the demand for oxygen is less.  Even so, a small grain crop that is submerged in water for two days, or longer, has little chance for survival.

Flooding of water intolerant crops generally disrupts normal transpiration and water adsorption.  Stomata in affected plants will close and can remain closed for long periods, the duration is affected by soil water conditions following the flooding.  The net effect is reduced respiration, transpiration, and photosynthesis.  When a crop does survive flooding recovery may very slow.

Michael D. Peel
NDSU Extension Service
370G Loftsgard Hall
Fargo, ND 58105-5051
Email
'mpeel@ndsuext.nodak.edu'
http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/aginfo/smgrains/smgrains.htm

Office    (701) 231-8037
Fax  (701) 231-8474
Sec. (701) 231-7125

 

 

DISEASES PLAGUE KANSAS WHEAT
Disease has gone on a rampage in the wheat fields of south central Kansas, and yields are expected to suffer major damage. In some fields, growers have found that 20-40% of heads died prematurely, leaving kernels blank or at best only partially filled and likely to shrivel, says Kansas State Extension plant pathologist Bob Bowden. "It looks like losses will certainly be well above average this year."

Meanwhile, agronomists in western Kansas, Nebraska and eastern Colorado report that a late spring freeze that occurred on May 13th will likely result in a 30% yield loss in their area. http://email.agriculture.com/cgi-bin1/flo?x=dhBBEYBEmwAKhomhug

 

 

HARVEST REPORTS ON SOFT AND HARD RED WHEAT
Soft Red Winter
SRW harvest is under way in the southern US with Arkansas, North Carolina, and Missouri at 54%, 28% and 22% respectively harvested. Illinois and Indiana are 1% harvested. Crop conditions in the SRW growing region show very little poor or very poor wheat. Preliminary Arkansas data indicate good wheat quality with test weights in the 54-59.5 lb/bu (71.2-78.3 kg/hl) range, protein content in the 9.0% to 11.3% range, falling numbers in the 292 to 389 range and moisture in the 11.1% to 13.0% range

Hard Red Winter
The hard red winter wheat harvest is active in the southern Great Plains and this is the first weekly report for the 2000 harvest season. Harvest commenced earlier than in 1999 due to warm May temperatures, which shortened the grain filling period and accelerated ripening. The very dry weather has been well suited for harvest activity. North central Texas and southwest Oklahoma data are reported here. For the harvest thus far, test weight ranges from 54.0 to 62.0 lb/bu (71.2-80.4 kg/hl), protein (12% mb) ranges from 9.6% to 15.5%, and moisture range is 9.1% to 13.8%. Falling numbers are in the 350 to 460 second range. Some harvesting was underway in south central and southwest Kansas. Anecdotal information suggests test weight and moisture are in the same range as reported above. No protein reports have been received from Kansas so far. Wheat harvested in Texas, Oklahoma and Kansas stands at 41%, 61% and 9 % respectively, according to the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS). Other NASS data of interest is crop condition. As of 6/12/00, the percentages of very poor and poor wheat had increased slightly from the previous week.
 

 

U.S. WINTER WHEAT CROP REPORTS
US crop watchers indicate heavy rain and thunderstorms have been occurring over the last 10 days in north-central Texas and southern Oklahoma, resulting in persistent winter wheat harvesting delays.  Sources suggest that, although weekly US winter wheat crop ratings have slipped lower over the past six weeks, these rain events have not "seriously" compromised the overall quality of the crop.  However, continued showers and thunderstorms are expected to prevail in the coming week across much of the central and southern Great Plains, where wheat is either ripening or fully mature at this point in the year.  Less moisture and firm soil have helped harvest progress in the lower Midwest, where reportedly little to no deterioration has occurred in overall wheat quality.  Newswire sources indicate spring wheat is beginning to head in some areas of the northern Plains, while most of the crop remains in the joint to boot stage of development.  For the most part, mild to warm temperatures and timely rains have been favorable in supporting good crop development, and little change in the weather pattern is forecast for the coming week.

 -Sources report the Nebraska Wheat Board (NWB) is estimating Nebraska's 2000-01 winter wheat output at around 60 MB (1.6 MMT), lower than USDA's recent forecast of 73.5 MB (2.0 MMT).  Some members of the NWB speculate a combination of drought conditions and recent hot winds may have reduced hard red winter wheat yields in some areas by 50%, especially the western part of the state.  Furthermore, the executive director indicates a mid-May frost event sterilized portions of the crop, furthering yield loss in the state.  In addition, producer sources who have begun harvesting new-crop hard red winter wheat in portions of far southern Nebraska anticipate yields of fewer than 30 BU/AC (2.02 MT/HA), well below the average yield of 42 BU/AC (2.82 MT/HA) forecast by the latest USDA supply/demand report.

 

 

CANOLA SPRAY DECISIONS FOR SCLEROTINIA MANAGEMENT
The decision to use a fungicide for Sclerotinia management is never easy due to the cost of registered fungicides. Conditions favoring Sclerotinia and an economic return include plentiful rainfall leading up to flowering, a dense canopy, and a forecast of continued wet or humid weather after the application. Yield potential should be 1,500 lb/A or more. Most Canadian recommendations stress a yield potential of 1,500 lb/A. With sagging oilseed prices, we need to consider the cost
of fungicide more closely. If the cost is less than $20/A a yield potential of 1,500 lb/A may be considered if disease potential is high, but if the cost of fungicide is more than $20/A a yield potential of at least 2,000 lb/A is needed for the likelihood of an economic return.

For producers near the Canadian border, the Web site of the Canola Council of Canada provides useful information at http://www.canola-council.org.  Click on "Weather and Crop Forecasts" then click on "Sclerotinia Risk Maps". These risk maps are updated twice a week, beginning in mid-June.

Another decision aid is the Sclerotinia Risk Assessment, which is reproduced, by permission of the Canola Council of Canada, in North Dakota Extension Report 54, by Arthur Lamey and Richard Meronuck. The risk assessment is also available on the Canola Council of Canada Web site.

Art Lamey
Extension Plant Pathologist
alamey@ndsuext.nodak.edu

 

 

S FOR CANOLA RESCUE
Research at Langdon has indicated that application of sulfur fertilizer solutions with any herbicide with an oil adjuvant is not recommended due to excessive burn. The use of ammonium thiosulfate in particular (12-0-0-27S) is only possible in canola due to the waxy cuticle it develops after the 5-leaf stage. The oil breaks down the cuticle and would result in severe burns if AMTHIO was applied. Application of the sulfur first, then the herbicide after a few days would be appropriate. Remember
that S application will only increase yields postemergence if the S is applied before bolting. Do not apply S even as an experiment during flowering.

Dr. Dave Franzen
NDSU Extension Soil Specialist

 

 

ANALYZING AND EVALUATING CROP PROBLEMS
Persons working in crop production are often called upon to trouble-shoot in situations involving suspected crop injury from herbicides. These situations require careful analysis and scouting before judgements are formulated. For purposes of this discussion, I would like to define "injury" as stunting, delayed development or malformation of plant tissues, which may or may not affect yields. Herbicide injury may result from applications to the crop, from residues in the soil or from drift.

When evaluating crops involved in suspected herbicide injury, keep in mind that some other factors may have caused the observed effects or the herbicide may be only one of a combination of several casual factors. Look for other possible causes. Are there holes in the leaves or stems or pruned roots from insect damage? Has there been severe weather - wind, drought, hail, flooding, frost, high temperatures, etc. -- that could have caused damage, Flooding damage in crops which recently occurred, greatly compounds the diagnosis. Could a disease be involved? Could it be excessive or misplaced row fertilizer or a nutrient deficiency? Or is the effect resulting from a combination of causes?

Look for patterns of injury in the field. Herbicide injury is often in a pattern associated with soil types or movement of application or incorporation equipment. Observe other susceptible crops or weeds in the area for herbicide effects. For comparison, try to find a check area where no herbicide was applied in the same field.

If you conclude that herbicides are the probable cause of crop injury, try to determine why the injury occurred. Limited crop tolerance to certain herbicides is sometimes a problem especially under heavy rainfall or sandy soils or on dry, loose soil. Misuse -- high rates, wrong chemical, improper method of application, no uniform application, overlaps, improper applicator adjustments and tillage operations that

concentrate the chemical - are some reasons for herbicide injury. Some varieties/hybrids are more susceptible than others. Weather and soil conditions that cause plant stress may make the crop more susceptible to herbicide injury.

Don't be too hasty to evaluate the affects of herbicide injury. Give the plants a chance to recover. Check growing points to see if the plants have potential for recover. Compare injury effects and weed control benefits. Stand counts and injured plant counts are important considerations. Unbiased yield checks in affected and unaffected similar areas of the same field are the best estimates.

Duane Berglund, PhD
Extension Agronomist
dberglun@ndsuext.nodak.edu

 

 

INTERNATIONAL LEAFY SPURGE PROGRAM SET FOR JUNE 27 NEAR WALHALLA
A one-day educational program focusing on the noxious weed leafy spurge will be held from 9 a.m. until 4 p.m. on Tuesday, June 27, at Frostfire Mountain, a year-round resort located about six miles west of Walhalla on County Road 55. The event is being sponsored by the North Dakota State University Extension Service and the Pembina County Biological Weed Control Office.

"This event will be held rain or shine," says Randy Melaas, cropping systems extension agent in Pembina County. "All the presentations will take place in the 500-seat amphitheater at Frostfire Mountain."

Graphic accompanies this story in hard copy and is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.ext.nodak.edu/extnews/newsrelease/2000/061500/01inde x.htm

 

 

WHEAT MIDGE  EMERGENCE IN SOUTHEAST ND
It's that time of year for wheat midge emergence to get underway in southern ND counties. We have reached 1200 DD in Richland, Sargent, Ransom, Dickey, LaMoure, and Cass counties. These counties have not had significant numbers of midge found during fall surveys.

However, there have been isolated fields where populations have come close or slightly exceeded the treatment threshold of 1 adult midge per 4 to 5 wheat heads in previous seasons. Since a large number of fields will be heading soon, some evening scouting would be recommended to assess adult populations in the region.

To see when your production area reaches 1200 DD, the point when wheat midge emergence gets underway, visit the NDSU Entomology Updates web site at http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu

Of greater concern in these parts of the state will still be the Cereal Aphids. Surveys indicate populations of aphids are still low. The recent rains and abundant predators are going to help delay aphid population increases. Grain growers and consultants in South Dakota are reporting larger populations of aphidsthis week. Their wheat is a little farther along than ours and fully headed fields are present in that area.

Phillip A. Glogoza
Dept of Entomology
NDSU
Fargo, ND  58105
phone:  701.231.7581
fax:    701.231.8557
e-mail:
pglogoza@ndsuext.nodak.edu