Navigation Image Map
 

News from the Minnesota Association of Wheat
Growers for Friday, April 14,  2000

CHINA AND U.S. WHEAT EXPERTS PREPARE FOR OPENING MARKETS
Two separate teams of Chinese officials made trade visits to the U.S. this week, and next week U.S. wheat officials will be traveling to China, all in preparation for future sales of U.S. wheat to that country. The increased activity is in hopeful anticipation of normal trade relations (NTR) which will likely result in increased wheat exports, once Congress votes to give permanent NTR to China.

The visits are the latest in a growing dialogue on wheat trade and marketing in anticipation of U.S. congressional approval of normal trade relations.  If Congress approves the permanent status for China, U.S. wheat exports could increase as much as 10 percent.

Next week, U.S. Wheat Associates experts are traveling to China, and will be meeting with flour milling industry representatives and public officials in Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, Guangzhou and Hong Kong.

USW vice president Paul Dickerson will be explaining the U.S. wheat market system.  "China is on the cusp of economic and agricultural changes that will benefit both of our countries, and the U.S. wheat industry must be first in line when that door opens," Dickerson pointed out.  "We have to develop the wheat market now, and the best way we can do that is to meet and exchange information."

 

 

FIRST WHEAT SALE TO SUDAN SINCE TRADE SANCTIONS EASED
The first commercial sale of wheat to Sudan since U.S. trade sanctions were lifted last year has been confirmed by U.S. Wheat Associates.  The sale of 31,000 metric tons of hard red winter wheat comes after U.S. wheat industry officials conducted several planning sessions with traders and millers who operate in Sudan.

Due to the absence of U.S. wheat over the last ten years, Australia and Canada have become the top supplier of wheat to Sudan.  President Clinton's announcement last spring that U.S. sanctions on medicine and food were eased was welcome news to America's wheat producers and traders.

"With the U.S. trade sanctions in Sudan, miller and buyers had very little familiarity with the U.S. marketing system or U.S. wheat classes," reports Dick Prior, USW vice president for the Middle East and East Africa. "This is a potentially important market for us, and the U.S. wheat industry has worked hard to reestablish ties with Sudanese millers."

Wheat consumption in Sudan is generally pegged at a little over one million metric tons. Sudan's 1999 wheat crop was estimated at about 70% below the 1998 crop.

 

 

USDA TO DECIDE ON SUGAR PURCHASE
Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman says USDA will decide "fairly soon" whether to purchase sugar from farmers faced with loan forfeitures later this year. Glickman told REUTERS, "If we are going to act, we need to take action fairly soon," adding that he still needs to meet with some senators from sugar growing regions and other sugar groups. An increase in sugar production "will certainly increase the pressure on us to do something," he said. Sugar industry officials are urging the government to buy up to 350,000 short tons of sugar to avoid larger loan forfeitures. The issue has become increasingly critical, says REUTERS, as two sugar beet processing facilities in California and one in Washington State are on the brink of collapse because of low prices. USDA believes loan forfeitures are likely when raw cane sugar prices decline below 20 cents per pound in Florida and Louisiana and 21 cents in Hawaii. Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-IN) Tuesday urged USDA to reject a sugar industry request to buy surplus sugar and donate it overseas or sell it to the ethanol industry. "I strongly oppose doing this sort of thing," Lugar said at a Senate committee hearing on ethanol. USDA chief economist Keith Collins said, "On its surface, it (buying sugar to avoid forfeitures) looks like a horrific taxpayer cost."

 

 

COMMITTEE SEEKS LEGISLATIVE DIRECTION ON MTBE
April 12, 2000

The Senate Agriculture Committee is seeking direction on legislation needed to help MTBE exit the reformulated gasoline scene and whether a bill should include consideration of "all of the environmental and energy security issues involved," according to committee Chairman Richard Lugar (R-IN).

"Our air quality and water quality are both extremely important," Lugar said. "It is clear that MTBE is on its way out. The question is, what kind of legislation" is needed now. Lugar has introduced legislation, that has passed the Senate and is supported by the administration, to increase research to create biofuels from almost anything that grows, including agricultural wastes, weeds and much municipal waste.

The chemistry for the actual process is known, Lugar says, but the legislation is needed to bring affordable biomass ethanol to the market. The bill also would establish a $49 million a year research effort over six years involving national laboratories, universities and industry.

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), the committee's ranking Democrat, is preparing to introduce a bill to tighten air quality performance standards in the Clean Air Act's reformulated gasoline program and maintain and enhance ethanol's "rightful opportunity" to deliver clean air benefits.

 

 

RRV FARMS INCOME REBOUNDED IN 1999
The average net income of Red River Valley farms enrolled in North Dakota and Minnesota's Farm Business Management Education Program was $87,000 in 1999, up from $20,600 in 1998 and $37,000 in 1997, says an agricultural economist at North Dakota State University.

Net farm income is income before self-employment and income taxes and family living expenses, explains Andrew Swenson, farm management specialist with the NDSU Extension Service. Net farm income is calculated on a per-farm basis. Because some farms are partnerships or family corporations, the net farm income must be divided among multiple operators.

"Most Red River Valley producers would no doubt agree that 1999 turned out better than expected and that the reversal was needed,"Swenson says.

Only 7 percent of farms had a negative net income in 1999, compared to nearly 40 percent in 1998, and farm debt improved for the first time in three years, Swenson says. But a significant increase in government payments was the main factor contributing to the turnaround.

"Government payments averaged $91,375 in 1999, compared to a two-year average of $28,000 for 1997 and 1998," Swenson says. "The reason for the increase was twofold: one, the level of loan deficiency payments resulting from low commodity prices, and two, the emergency federal legislation that provided market loss payments and crop loss disaster assistance."

The Farm Business Management report also shows that the size of farms in the Red River Valley continues to increase. The 211 farms featured in the 1999 report averaged 1,729 acres, of which 72 percent was cash rented. The average size of farms in the 1998 report was 1,485 acres.

"Raising spring wheat on cash-rented land showed a loss of $12 per acre, for the third consecutive year," Swenson continues. "Sugarbeets on cash rented land returned $105 per acre in 1999, but producers with cash-rented land and a joint-venture arrangement for the sugarbeet stock lost $31 per acre, on average."

Average yields of corn and soybeans on cash-rented ground were very good in 1999, at 127 and 36 bushels per acre, respectively. Even so, corn lost $17 per acre, Swenson says. In contrast, soybeans showed a $26-per-acre profit.

Swenson says the annual Farm Business Management report is designed to help Red River Valley farmers make more informed management decisions by providing measures of comparison to other farms in the area. Detailed 1999 costs and returns for each crop enterprise are included in the report. The study also might be useful to educators, bankers and consultants.

The report costs $5 plus handling and shipping and can be ordered in Minnesota by writing to Robert Bollesen at Northland Community and Technical College, Highway 1 East, Thief River Falls, MN 56701. Bollesen can be reached by telephone at (218) 681-0797. North Dakota producers interested in the report can write to Farm Business Management, P.O. Box 6022, Bismarck, ND 58506, or they can call (701) 328-3162. The report also is available via Internet at http://www.mgt.org/fbm/reports/1999/valley/valley.htm

 

 

SDSU TO HOST MULTI-NATION CONFERENCE TO ANALYZE NAFTA
BROOKINGS, S.D.--South Dakota State University will host a three-nation Conference Sept. 28-29 to analyze the effectiveness and assess the future of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

Robert Burns, distinguished professor and head of the Department of Political Science at SDSU, is organizing the conference on a $7,000 grant from the Canadian Studies Grant Program of the Canadian national government and a match from SDSU President Peggy Gordon Elliott.

Burns expects to bring Canadian national government, trade, academic, and provincial officials, plus producers, to Brookings to meet with their counterparts from the United States and Mexico.  Burns also said the Governor's office will assist in inviting neighboring state governors and the Canadian provincial premiers.

Burns hopes the conference will accomplish a better understanding of NAFTA provisions and how it will impact the demand for and price of agricultural goods. He also hopes the conference will produce recommendations for refinement of NAFTA provisions to provide more price stability and equity for both U.S. and Canadian agricultural producers.

Burns said the conference will be open to anyone interested. The only registration fee will be for the Thursday night banquet and the Friday noon luncheon.  Burns' intent is for the conference to be conducted in "straight talk" with audience input. He added, "I don't want to discourage people from attending by thinking it is just a high level discussion among academicians." More details as to participants will be announced as the event nears, Burns said.  

The conference is for people affected by NAFTA, rather than the officials who administer the organization.   The issues of contention include: outlawing export subsidies, relying upon scientific judgment in the promulgation of sanitary and health rules, making import quota management transparent, and preventing domestic subsidies from creating trade-distorting production.

 

 

WILLISTON PRODUCERS IN PILOT PROJECT MARKETING WHEAT TO END USERS
A number of North Dakota wheat producers in the Williston area have made a commitment to become part of a pilot project involving NorthernStar Company, a subsidiary of a Michigan-based agricultural supply company. Implementation of the project is dependent upon securing grant funding to help with first-year development costs. What the 10 farmers and NorthernStar propose to do is this: form an alliance that provides end users with a consistent supply of superior-quality hard red spring wheat.

By planting cultivars that possess specific processing characteristics, the farmers and Northern Star intend to create an identity-preserved system that controls wheat quality from the field to the factory, explains Randy Mehlhoff, a value-added specialist at North Dakota State University's Williston Research Extension Center.

"With this identity-preserved system, there would be no blending of varieties at the elevator," Mehlhoff stresses. "The goal is to give the end users of hard red spring wheat precisely what they want, in terms of quality specs."

NorthernStar selected the Williston area to launch the pilot project in this region because the climate is drier than other parts of the state and therefore offers less potential for disease in wheat, especially Fusarium head blight (scab). Also, the amount of irrigation in the area was a factor, Mehlhoff says. Last year Northern Star contracted 20,000 acres with Michigan wheat producers.

Potential Buyers, Acreage Potential
Who might be the end users of Great Plains wheat? Firms such as Nabisco Company and General Mills Inc., Mehlhoff says. The NDSU Extension Service has become involved in this project to help test the region's ability to develop this type of production system, which may position NorthernStar as a preferred supplier and help the state's wheat producers take advantage of a value-added opportunity.

"Processors are currently paying a 20- to 30-cent premium for wheat that meets their specs," Mehlhoff says. "By helping NorthernStar discover additional quality traits for the end user, they could become a preferred supplier, and the premium for our producers would grow to reflect the superior quality."

Because this is the pilot project's first year in this region, NorthernStar is contracting production on only about 2,000 acres, all of which will be under irrigation. If the project succeeds, Mehlhoff expects that perhaps as many as 20,000 acres will be under contract next year, and in future years perhaps as many as 50,000 acres. He says that while NorthernStar is initially looking only at irrigated acres, the company will also be considering dryland production depending on the success of the pilot year.

"A critical component of this project is that producers must be willing to form a production alliance with NorthernStar," Mehlhoff stresses. "That means entering into a production contract, and each producer will need to negotiate an individual contract, the terms of which will be based on the average production history (APH) for the past several years."

Who Pays for What?
An innovative feature of this production and marketing alliance is centered on input costs. NorthernStar will pay for variable costs including seed, fertilizer, chemicals, crop insurance and others. As part of this arrangement, NorthernStar works with producers to select which hard red spring wheat cultivars they will plant along with the chemicals they will use. For their part, the farmers must prepare the seedbed, plant the seed, irrigate the crop, co-manage the crop with NorthernStar, and harvest and deliver the grain to a designated facility. In addition, farmers must pay all the expenses related to their responsibilities, such as diesel fuel.

"Because producers have to come up with significantly less money to cover their input costs, they benefit from a cash flow standpoint," Mehlhoff says.

Under the terms of their contract, producers are guaranteed an acreage payment that is the difference between their APH times the contract price minus the input costs covered by NorthernStar, Mehlhoff says. For example, assume a producer contracts with an APH of 60 bushels per acre at a price of $2.75 per bushel for a projected total revenue of $165 per acre. Assume further that input costs covered by NorthernStar total $85 per acre. The producer, then, receives a per-acre payment of $80.

"The producer must decide if the payment is enough to cover costs of seeding, watering and harvesting," Mehlhoff says. "Any premiums received for high yields and crop quality will be shared by NorthernStar and the producer. The alternative is to continue producing and marketing wheat as the producer has done in the past."

Since NorthernStar bases each contract on field-specific data, one producer may contract for 50 bushels an acre while another may contract for 65 bushels an acre, Mehlhoff explains. In the case of a total crop failure due to hail or some other natural phenomenon, NorthernStar will guarantee a per-acre payment based on 75 percent of the APH. In the event of a total crop loss, a producer with an APH of 60 bushels per acre who contracted for $2.75 a bushel would receive $38.75 (60 bushels per acre X 0.75 = 45 bushels per acre X $2.75 = $123.75 - $85 = $38.75).

"This alliance represents a new type of opportunity for producers," Mehlhoff concludes. "Producers won't get rich through a program like this, but they'll be able to make a profit, and do so on a consistent basis."

 

 

SPRING SAFETY INTO FIELD WORK, SAFETY SPECIALIST ADVISES
With the press of field work and preparations for another crop season comes increases in the number of agriculture-related injuries. Planning and precautions can cut your risk, according to an agricultural safety specialist at North Dakota State University.

"The injuries most likely to happen with spring work include sprains, strains, cuts and broken bones," says George Maher of the NDSU Extension Service.  "Precautions need to be taken during maintenance and field work with planting and tillage equipment.

Hitching and unhitching cultivators and planting equipment, changing cultivator shovels and other tillage tool maintenance are common tasks that present some real threats." Read the full report at http://www.ext.nodak.edu/extnews