Navigation Image Map
 

News from the Minnesota Association of Wheat
Growers for Monday, March 6,  2000

COMMENTS ON CHINA'S WHEAT PURCHASE AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE FUTURE

One newswire article suggests China's Vice Minister for Trade and Economic Cooperation feels their recent purchase of US wheat has a greater overall significance to future sales than can be measured by its volume.  Furthermore, the Vice Minster indicated that US meat and citrus provide the best possibility for increased farm exports to China, but he did not rule out additional US wheat sales following changes in China's domestic farm policy designed to discourage wheat production.

In addition, USDA Secretary Dan Glickman indicated he expected China to purchase additional quantities of US wheat in the future, along with beef, pork and citrus.  Testifying before the Senate Agriculture Committee, Glickman suggested China would very likely follow up their recent wheat purchase with larger, or more "significant" quantities.  At the hearing, Glickman and others were trying to stress how important the granting of Permanent Normal Trading Relations for China would be to the US agriculture industry.  Wheat producer representatives attending the hearing agreed, indicating that nothing on the immediate horizon could have as big an impact on US wheat exports as China's WTO accession.

 

 

IS BRIDGING THE DIGITAL DIVIDE A WASTE OF TAX MONEY?
Reuters reports the USDA's Rural Utility Service (RUS) provided billions in low-cost, federally funded loans to firms that did not need government aid, according to a recent internal audit. More than half of the $4.8 billion in RUS loans between 1981 and 1997 went to telecommunications companies strong enough financially that they  did not need government assistance, the report said. But, RUS Acting Administrator Christopher McLean says tightening lending requirements would mean less oversight of telecommunication companies and "could result in many rural Americans becoming the economic 'have-nots' of the 21st Century." Rural sociologist Don  Dillman seems to share this worry. At Monday's 2000 Ag Forum at Iowa State University, he said he thinks the digital divide "may not be transitional."

http://email.agriculture.com/cgi-bin1/flo?x=dEKuogBohwAuuhKuw

 

 

BIOTECH COMPANIES FINALLY PLANNING TO HELP IN GEO BATTLE
Monsanto Co., DuPont Co., Novartis AG and other biotech companies have set this summer as the launch for a big television ad campaign to help build support for genetically enhanced crops.

"The ground that we've lost in the acceptance of biotechnology in the marketplace is a war that we have lost, because we didn't show up to fight the battle," John Sorenson, a Novartis Seeds official, said last week in Washington. More at www.profarmer.com

 

 

RUSSIA SAYS FOOD AID, SEED DONATION SIGNED
Russia and the US have signed a memorandum for a food aid donation of 500,000 tons and a 20,000 ton seed donation, Bridge News reported. The Russians said the supplies were expected to be made very soon.

The first shipments within the food aid package are expected in Russia by late March or early April.

An official with the Agriculture Ministry said last week the US had already shipped the seeds, and the seeds are expected to arrive during the first half of March.

www.agdayta.com

 

 

CAMERAS MAY BECOME TOOLS TO FIGHT WEEDS, REDUCE HERBICIDE USE
March 3, 2000
Taking pictures of weeds may not seem like the best way to keep them from harming crops. But digital cameras may soon become important weed-fighting tools in farm fields. They may also make it possible to cut herbicide use, according to an entomologist with the University of Minnesota Extension Service.

"The cameras are used in site-specific pest management systems," says Ian MacRae. "German researchers at the University of Bonn's Institut Fur Pflanzenbau have successfully developed a prototype onboard system to identify and treat weed species in the field."

MacRae says the researchers, Roland Gerhards and Walter Kuhbauch, described the system at a recent international scientific meeting. They use digital cameras mounted on a boom across the front of a tractor.

The cameras photograph the plant canopy and send the images to an onboard computer. A database in the computer compares the plant canopy images with 80 different weed images and decides if the photo depicts a weed or crop plant. If it's a weed, the computer signals the sprayer to open a nozzle and apply herbicide. Because the computer knows the camera's location on the boom, only nozzles over the plant are opened.

While all this is going on, the computer also logs the location of the weeds on an onboard geographic information system, creating a weed map of the entire field.

"The system is apparently about 80 percent efficient in identifying weeds, and will err on the conservative side," says MacRae. "In other words, if it can't identify a plant, it will not
trigger a herbicide application. And since areas without weeds get no
herbicide, the system has the potential to greatly reduce overall
herbicide application."

Web,V2,F4,R1 macrae

Source: Ian MacRae, (218) 281-8611
Editor: Joseph Kurtz, (612) 625-3168,
 
pkurtz@extension.umn.edu