Library Home
E-Mail
Back
Prairie Grains is the
official publication of
the Minnesota
Association of
Wheat Growers,
North Dakota Grain Growers Association,
South Dakota Wheat,
Inc., and the
Minnesota Barley
Growers Association.
|
What will a farm bill that calls for less
government involvement and less commodity-specific
legislation mean to commodity groups, whose major
function traditionally has been lobbying for favorable
policy? That question and the future role of commodity
groups was discussed at a meeting of the Northern Prairie
Chapter of the National Ag Marketing Association (NAMA),
recently in Fargo.
Certainly, the need for agriculture to have a
legislative presence will still exist. A costly
regulatory proposal, for example, is always just one
lawmaker away from being introduced in a bill at state
and federal levels.
But at the same rate, it won't be business as usual.
With agricultural policy at a crossroads, commodity
groups need to prepare themselves and their members for
changes and opportunities which lie in the future. This
may mean a shift in focus and priorities.
"The trend is of less government involvement and
more involvement in the marketplace," said Dave
Torgerson, executive director of the Minnesota
Association of Wheat Growers. Although there will still
be a need to monitor state and federal legislative
matters, Torgerson feels that the MAWG will also need to
be more of a service organization, educating members and
providing leadership in new ways.
Such as helping members understand and adopt new
technologies, like the internet, and establishing
value-added opportunities. Indeed, it was trade and
value-added issues, rather than ag policy, taking center
stage at the MAWG's last state convention.
The MAWG played a key role in developing the Red River
Farm Network over the radio, as well as the recently
announced United Spring Wheat Processors. Perhaps the
commodity group of the future will look at itself more as
a company, and members as shareholders, Torgerson said.
Mark Weber, executive director of the Red River Valley
Sugarbeet Growers Association, (RRVSGA) agrees with the
need to add value to farm commodities, and that commodity
groups can help in that regard.
He pointed out too that a commodity-specific focus
does have its legislative advantages. The RRVSGA
successfully focused on the sugar program in the farm
bill debate. And some issues affect certain commodities
more than others; workers compensation insurance and
migrant labor, for instance, are issues more unique to
sugar.
Larry Kleingartner, executive director for the
National Sunflower Association, said that marketing and
international trade is already the NSA's biggest issue
and will continue to be in the future. "The aim of
our organization is profitability. If the farmer is
profitable, the industry is profitable," he said.
The leaders agreed that there are constants to
commodity groups, no matter what the issue: commodity
groups will always have the ability to provide producers
and industry members commodity-specific information and
action that won't be available or generated elsewhere.
And, building coalitions with one another and other
organizations heightens the effectiveness in addressing
the topic or issue at hand.
|